Was that pattern of that "nasty mess" constant, or it was dynamic (i.e. it
changed sometimes)
And, are you using OpenCL or only CPU?
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:27 PM, David Vincent-Jones
wrote:
> On Monday, July 14, 2014 14:00 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, 17:59:16 sch
On Monday, July 14, 2014 14:00 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, 17:59:16 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > I was working on an image with lots of reds so I tried switching the
> > over/under indicator to another color what I got was a purple image
> > in
> > total and rever
Try lowering "lower threshold" and rising "upper threshold" in O/U settings.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:51 PM, David Vincent-Jones
wrote:
> On Monday, July 14, 2014 14:00 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, 17:59:16 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > > I was working on an image
On Monday, July 14, 2014 14:00 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, 17:59:16 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> > I was working on an image with lots of reds so I tried switching the
> > over/under indicator to another color what I got was a purple image
> > in
> > total and rever
Am Sonntag, 13. Juli 2014, 17:59:16 schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> I was working on an image with lots of reds so I tried switching the
> over/under indicator to another color what I got was a purple image in
> total and reversing the setting is not helping.
> Switching to black/white also giv
I was working on an image with lots of reds so I tried switching the
over/under indicator to another color what I got was a purple image in
total and reversing the setting is not helping.
Switching to black/white also gives me a totally white image.
David
--
The Indicator apparently signals any r, g or b element that reaches or
approaches the 255 level. This gives a false impression when one works
in B/W where I would be more interested to find levels approaching or at
L=100.
Would it be practical to have a switch on the indicator for a rgb-to-L
d
