Am 07.01.2014 20:49, schrieb David Vincent-Jones:
> It is just a thought but I would be interested to have other opinions.
You got the 'non-destructive'-thing wrong. It means your RAW will
*never* be modified (binary, at storage location). It does not say
anything about the operations and manipula
I think currently this is more reliable than existing open-source
implementations of content-aware fill, such as resynthesizer.
2014/1/7 David Vincent-Jones :
> Spot removal works just fine but I am a little concerned regarding the
> philosophy of the module in that it appears to swim against the