[darktable-user] Re: darktable and gimp 2.9

Am 04.01.2018 um 19:08 schrieb Matthias Bodenbinder: > Am 04.01.2018 um 18:59 schrieb François Patte: >> Bonjour, >> >> I just tried to experiment gimp 2.9 (development version): openning a >> raw file opens darktable and once you have finish to treat your photo in >> darktable, closing darktable

[darktable-user] Re: darktable and gimp 2.9

Am 04.01.2018 um 18:59 schrieb François Patte: > Bonjour, > > I just tried to experiment gimp 2.9 (development version): openning a > raw file opens darktable and once you have finish to treat your photo in > darktable, closing darktable imports the photo in gimp... Ok. > > But the result I had

[darktable-user] darktable and gimp 2.9

Bonjour, I just tried to experiment gimp 2.9 (development version): openning a raw file opens darktable and once you have finish to treat your photo in darktable, closing darktable imports the photo in gimp... Ok. But the result I had was awful: the image is to bright, without contrast and the

Re: [darktable-user] Color Lookup Tables

On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 4:40 AM, wrote: > On Thu, 04 Jan 2018 10:25:18 +0100 > Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > >> >>Same. The reason isn't that we don't know how to read such files but >>that our LUT module is not a general CLUT tool but more complicated

Re: [darktable-user] Color Lookup Tables

On Thu, 04 Jan 2018 10:25:18 +0100 Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > >Same. The reason isn't that we don't know how to read such files but >that our LUT module is not a general CLUT tool but more complicated >and doing something else than just looking up numbers in a LUT. They >are just

Re: [darktable-user] PTI patch impact on DT performance = 0,5 %

On 04/01/18 03:58 AM, Pascal Obry wrote: > Le jeudi 04 janvier 2018 à 09:27 +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder a écrit : >> with PTI= avg. 14,2581 s >> without PTI = avg. 14,1835 s >> Difference = 0,5 % >> >> The differnce is neglectable. It looks like DT performance is not >> affected by the PTI

Re: [darktable-user] darktable 2.4.0 released

Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2018, 08:16:16 CET schrieb Frank J.: [...] > It grabbed also some entries in the database that are not visible in > darktable. Maybe my database was corrupted in a crash? Hard to tell without seeing the library.db in question. > I removed them with parameter "-p". > >

Re: [darktable-user] Color Lookup Tables

Am Donnerstag, 4. Januar 2018, 02:18:29 CET schrieb darkta...@911networks.com: > On Wed, 03 Jan 2018 22:55:42 +0100 > > Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > >Am Mittwoch, 3. Januar 2018, 22:10:07 CET schrieb > > > >darkta...@911networks.com: > >> DT 2.4.0 > >> > >> I have a few HaldCLUT

[darktable-user] Re: PTI patch impact on DT performance = 0,5 %

Hallöchen! Matthias Bodenbinder writes: > [...] > Difference = 0,5 % DB-intensive operations may be affected more heavily (e.g. mass (re-)import of images). Probably nothing to worry about, still. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger

Re: [darktable-user] PTI patch impact on DT performance = 0,5 %

Le jeudi 04 janvier 2018 à 09:27 +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder a écrit : > with PTI= avg. 14,2581 s > without PTI = avg. 14,1835 s > Difference = 0,5 % > > The differnce is neglectable. It looks like DT performance is not > affected by the PTI patches. Thanks for the figures, this is a

[darktable-user] PTI patch impact on DT performance = 0,5 %

Hi, the new kernel 4.14.11 comes with the PTI patches. There are reports which indicate that these patches can have a severe performance impact (e.g. https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article=linux-415-x86pti=1) I did some benchmarks with DT. I am using Manjaro with latest kernel