I'm sorry developers That is not how I meant it at all. The way I
heard it is that when the guy whom packaged it for windows came around
(don't remember his name) there was discussion amongst the developers
whether or not they would authorize it. I wasn't privy to the
discussions so it is only
sorry... that message went to the wrong list
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 1:44 PM Michael wrote:
>
> > no, wrong, but they were not really interested and appears that there are
> > few willing to step up and package dt for windows. And dt is available
> > for what-ever platform where one is
* Michael [07-19-21 13:47]:
> > no, wrong, but they were not really interested and appears that there are
> > few willing to step up and package dt for windows. And dt is available
> > for what-ever platform where one is interested in complying.
> >
> How am I wrong?
you are posting FUD.
> no, wrong, but they were not really interested and appears that there are
> few willing to step up and package dt for windows. And dt is available
> for what-ever platform where one is interested in complying.
>
How am I wrong?
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
* Michael [07-19-21 13:37]:
> > Hmm, I see that AUR is using clang which always
> > depresses me but it seems to be par for the course on a lot of cmake
> > packages which are primarily developed for windoze.
>
> darktable is a Linux program. They only just recently made a windoze
> port. the
> Hmm, I see that AUR is using clang which always
> depresses me but it seems to be par for the course on a lot of cmake
> packages which are primarily developed for windoze.
darktable is a Linux program. They only just recently made a windoze
port. the developers were carried kicking and
