Hi All,
focus stacking is used a lot by scientists when they use microscopes.
There are some open source options that should work fine for normal images.
I have used Combine ZP with very good results before for macro images.
ImageJ I use for microscope images but have not yet tried on macro
There's more information about using enfuse here:
https://patdavid.net/2013/01/focus-stacking-macro-photos-enfuse.html
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, at 03:29, Frank J. wrote:
> I do focus-stacking with the following workflow:
>
> 1. Export minimal pre-processed pictures of the stack from darktable
If your camera body has the capability to stack images within the
firmware, and to output both JPG and RAW images already stacked(as so
many currently do), why do you need an additional body of work to be
added to the post-processing within darktable or Hugin? I'm curious as
to the thinking.
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 19:11:35 -0700
David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> If you have installed the script-manager it is located bottom right
> lightable menu column
How do you install the script-manage? I have darktable 3.0.2 on Ubuntu
18.04. The menu column shown here is from bottom up export
Am 19.04.20 um 20:48 schrieb J. Paul Bissonnette:
Is focus stacking possible in darktable 3.0.2?
I am using an Olympus OM D E-M5 mark 2 with the latest firmware.
The reason I am asking is that the stacked jpg made by the camera is so
much clearer than the stacked dng file from darktable.
I
If you have installed the script-manager it is located bottom right
lightable menu column
Hugin needs tif/tiff exported data so you can process in dt then
directly move to Hugin. If the script manage is not in place, then use
Hugin anyway.
On 2020-04-19 5:32 p.m., darkta...@911networks.com
Please look in the Script Manage and you will see if it is listed or not.
On 2020-04-19 4:05 p.m., Terry Pinfold wrote:
I use Windows platform. Is the Hugin/lua in place with windows or is this a
Linux only case?
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 08:08, David Vincent-Jones
wrote:
The Hugin/Lua script
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 15:07:32 -0700
David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> The Hugin/Lua script is already in place
Can you please clarify? Where and how?
My problem is slightly different, I want to send the exported to
mogrify, but it should be very similar...
Thanks
--
sknahT
vyS
I use Windows platform. Is the Hugin/lua in place with windows or is this a
Linux only case?
On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 08:08, David Vincent-Jones
wrote:
> The Hugin/Lua script is already in place
>
> David
> On 2020-04-19 3:01 p.m., J. Paul Bissonnette wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:53:44 -0400
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:53:44 -0400
Willy Williams wrote:
> My Lumix G9 does focus stacking in camera, then I punt it out to
> darktable for finishing. Can your body do that, too?
>
> Willy
>
> **
The Olympus E-M5.2 puts out 9 jpg +
My Lumix G9 does focus stacking in camera, then I punt it out to
darktable for finishing. Can your body do that, too?
Willy
**
On 4/19/2020 at 17:46, J. Paul Bissonnette wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 14:43:01 -0700
David Vincent-Jones
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 14:43:01 -0700
David Vincent-Jones wrote:
> But images can be directly passed to Hugin from darktable with
> the Lua script. Hugin will do the focus stacking for you.
I don't have a clue how to write a lua script.
>
> On 2020-04-19 2:37 p.m., J. Paul Bissonnette
But images can be directly passed to Hugin from darktable with the
Lua script. Hugin will do the focus stacking for you.
On 2020-04-19 2:37 p.m., J. Paul Bissonnette wrote:
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:19:29 -0300
Guillermo Rozas wrote:
No, focus stacking is not a form of HDR (and darktable
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:19:29 -0300
Guillermo Rozas wrote:
> No, focus stacking is not a form of HDR (and darktable doesn't do
> focus stacking). In the first case you take the best focused parts of
> each image, in the second case you take the best exposed parts
> (roughly speaking). The
No, focus stacking is not a form of HDR (and darktable doesn't do
focus stacking). In the first case you take the best focused parts of
each image, in the second case you take the best exposed parts
(roughly speaking). The algorithms involved in both cases are very
different.
Best regards,
15 matches
Mail list logo
