Hello, For what I know, camera manufacturers tend to add some (useless) processing to their JPEGs. And I think this is the same kind of behaviour with inkjet manufacturers, when they add porcessing to the printouts in photo mode. This processing is meant to feat the taste of a panel of people who were asked to. Most of the time, those people like flashy colours rather than softer but more realistic ones. I had a similar discussion with a professional photographer whom I showed 3 photos : - the first one, as from the camera JPEG - the second one, with (as as possible) accurate colours - then, the third, with colour saturation accentuation. I asked him to tell me which was which, and it didn't take more than 3 seconds to sort them. But, he added, his customers prefer photos of the first or even third kind (JPEGs from the camera) rather than those of the second, so he always adds saturation to his photos. Which I personally don't like at all... but I am not 99% of the customers.
Would you be surprised if I tell you that I prefer the raw sample ? I find it more accurate, and it shows more details in shadows. But, once again, I am not... J.-Luc > Message du 13/09/16 19:48 > De : "komodo" > A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.org > Copie à : > Objet : [darktable-user] Fuji X T10 lens correction or ? > > Hi, > > when i edit raw image it looks different than original jpeg from cam. > > https://postimg.org/image/xcheiwp7d/ > > https://postimg.org/image/gd8g3ndzt/ > > First is crop from raw, second is crop from jpeg, > > All from DT. > > So it's lens correction problem, or ? Do you have same behaviour ? > > Thank you > > Martin > > ____________________________________________________________________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
