Re: [darktable-user] CPU Recommendations

2018-03-25 Thread Patrik Marschalik
Thanks!

After removing my old configuration file the result was:

dev_process_export] pixel pipeline processing took 15,410 secs (219,753 CPU)

That is much better. :-)

Patrik

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 01:37:07PM -0400, Šarūnas wrote:
> On 03/25/2018 12:58 PM, Patrik Marschalik wrote:
> > When I am running
> >
> > darktable-cli bench.SRW bench.SRW.xmp test.jpg --core --disable-opencl
> > -d perf
> >
> > on my new Ryzen 7 1700 processor it takes around 33s, that is about
> > twice
> > the results from
> >
> > https://math.dartmouth.edu/~sarunas/darktable_bench.html
> >
> > $ grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo && free -h && lspci | grep "VGA" &&
> > uname -a
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> > model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
> >   totalusedfree  shared  buff/cache 
> > available
> > Mem:15G2,6G 11G 37M 1,8G 12G
> > Swap:   63G  0B 63G
> > 26:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP106 [GeForce GTX 
> > 1060 6GB] (rev a1)
> > Linux 4.14.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.14.13-1~bpo9+1 (2018-01-14) 
> > x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >
> > What could be the problem?
> 
> Perhaps you'd like to compare what takes how long. Here it is run on
> Ryzen 5 1600 3.6GHz:
> 
> $ darktable-cli bench.SRW bench.SRW.xmp test.jpg --core --disable-opencl
> -d perf
> output file already exists, it will get renamed
> 0.419067 [dev] took 0.192 secs (0.222 CPU) to load the image.
> 0.499966 [export] creating pixelpipe took 0.080 secs (0.115 CPU)
> 0.513925 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.013 secs (0.066 CPU) initing base buffer
> [export]
> 0.528093 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.014 secs (0.089 CPU) processed `raw
> black/white point' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 0.535352 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.007 secs (0.046 CPU) processed `white
> balance' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 0.617931 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.082 secs (0.974 CPU) processed
> `highlight reconstruction' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 0.763135 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.145 secs (1.681 CPU) processed
> `demosaic' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 1.343859 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.581 secs (4.136 CPU) processed `tone
> mapping' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 2.011026 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.667 secs (6.976 CPU) processed `lens
> correction' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 2.044709 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.034 secs (0.370 CPU) processed `base
> curve' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 2.069955 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.025 secs (0.265 CPU) processed `input
> color profile' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 2.191421 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.121 secs (1.371 CPU) processed `color
> reconstruction' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 10.639141 [dev_pixelpipe] took 8.448 secs (100.013 CPU) processed
> `denoise (non-local means)' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 11.032732 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.393 secs (3.990 CPU) processed `global
> tonemap' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 11.369133 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.336 secs (3.962 CPU) processed `shadows
> and highlights' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 13.517173 [dev_pixelpipe] took 2.148 secs (23.705 CPU) processed
> `equalizer' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 13.696848 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.180 secs (2.083 CPU) processed `local
> contrast' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 13.838740 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.142 secs (1.618 CPU) processed `color
> zones' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 13.872655 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.034 secs (0.385 CPU) processed `levels'
> on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 13.952512 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.080 secs (0.856 CPU) processed
> `sharpen' on CPU, blended on CPU [export]
> 13.975510 [dev_pixelpipe] took 0.023 secs (0.242 CPU) proc

Re: [darktable-user] CPU Recommendations

2018-03-25 Thread Patrik Marschalik
When I am running

darktable-cli bench.SRW bench.SRW.xmp test.jpg --core --disable-opencl
-d perf

on my new Ryzen 7 1700 processor it takes around 33s, that is about
twice
the results from

https://math.dartmouth.edu/~sarunas/darktable_bench.html

$ grep "model name" /proc/cpuinfo && free -h && lspci | grep "VGA" &&
uname -a
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
model name  : AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor
  totalusedfree  shared  buff/cache available
Mem:15G2,6G 11G 37M 1,8G 12G
Swap:   63G  0B 63G
26:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GP106 [GeForce GTX 1060 
6GB] (rev a1)
Linux 4.14.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.14.13-1~bpo9+1 (2018-01-14) x86_64 
GNU/Linux

What could be the problem?

Thanks,
Patrik

On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 08:35:14PM -0500, Šarūnas wrote:
> On 02/04/2018 05:38 PM, Robert Bieber wrote:
> > Oh yeah, I'm just talking about the price of the CPU, not the whole PC.
> > I'm planning on doing all out on RAM and solid state drives as well. I
> > guess GPU might be of some concern as well, how has GPU processing in
> > dark table on Linux been going lately? I know it exists, but I'm always
> > scared of anything to do with graphics drivers on Linux
> 
> GPU might just be the upgrade with the biggest impact for RAW
> processing. To have that impact it will need not only the drivers to
> work, but also the corresponding OpenCL part...
> 
> This topic comes up from time to time here, so, as already mentioned, it
> may make sense to search the archives.
> 
> With Nvidia things may seem more stable, but it's not that one just
> installs proprietary drivers + OpenCL from the distribution's
> repositories and it "just works". You need proprietary Nvidia drivers
> for OpenCL to work.
> 
> With AMD it is already possible to have a completely open source setup.
> amdgpu is in the kernel, and the OpenCL part can come from the open
> source ROCm. It will limit you to certain AMD GPUs and Linux kernel/X
> versions. To have a wider range, the open source kernel amdgpu can be
> combined with the OpenCL part from AMD's proprietary amdgpu-pro — that
> works well too.
> 
> I have some random tests listed here:
> math.dartmouth.edu/~sarunas/darktable_bench.html
> 
> 
> -- 
> Šarūnas Burdulis
> math.dartmouth.edu/~sarunas
> 




darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org