As did I.
Graham
On 22/01/17 17:14, john wrote:
I followed this with a lot of success:
https://www.printerknowledge.com/threads/using-argyllcms-colormunki-to-produce-excellent-printer-profiles.6878/page-3
John
On 22/01/17 16:35, Tony Arnold wrote:
Has anyone on this list had any success
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:51 AM, wrote:
> I just now went into settings
> shortcuts to see if I could bind a keyboard input to the "auto" button in the
> levels module. There wasn't any such binding, but there *was* a subsection
> for "fusion", which, as far as I
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:41 PM, wrote:
> It might be best if all references to blending-fusion in the interface were
> consistent.
Yes, i'm surprised each time i look at the accels. Not that it happens often.
No clue why it is the way it is.
> --
> jys
>
>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 23:10, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> For sure, if you want a real HDR image you'll need several bracketed
> images, but then you'll have to use an external tool if you want
> the equivalent of the basecurve exposure fusion.
You could certainly use the "create HDR" function
David Vincent-Jones writes:
> Fusion appears to work (fairly well) on single images ... is this the
> intent or should multiple images be used?
dt itself almost never works with multiple images (the darkroom pipeline
works on a single image, AFAIK "Create HDR" from
Fusion appears to work (fairly well) on single images ... is this the
intent or should multiple images be used?
David
On 01/23/2017 12:13 PM, Roman Lebedev wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:41 PM, wrote:
It might be best if all references to blending-fusion in