I have a set of files I shot with a Nikon D3400. I was bringing them into
Lightable today, and when double clicking on an image to bring it up, i get the
message that says 'Failed to read camera white balance information.'
I've not seen this before, but admittedly since I switched back to
Answering part of mine own question. Converting to DNG solves the problem but I
don't know what I'm losing converting to DNG.
Mike.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 16:49, Mike Strock wrote:
> I have a set of files I shot with a Nikon D3400. I was bringing them into
>
What do I lose converting from CR2 RAW files to DNG? I always shoot raw but is
there a benefit or a degradation to converting to DNG for future proofing my
images?
If this is off topic I apologize.
Mike.
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
Hi Mike,
this is a known issue. Bug is in rawspeed.
E.g.: https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed/issues/129
BR, Micha.
Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. August 2018 um 02:58 Uhr
Von: "Mike Strock"
An: "darktable-user@lists.darktable.org"
Betreff: Re: [darktable-user] "Failed to read
Personally, I'm OK with converted CR2 → DNG, it works fine from my
experience. But I have problems with NEF → DNG, there is some problem with
maker notes interpretation in exiv2 (used by dt) which leads to problems in
lens detection (hence no automatic lens correction). I know that some
developers
What do I lose converting from CR2 RAW files to DNG? I always
shoot raw but is there a benefit or a degradation to converting to
DNG for future proofing my images?
What I recall reading on the list is generally against conversion to
DNG. My understanding is that a) the format is
