Herbert Xu wrote:
>Unfortunately we may need this at some point in the future due
>to changes in POSIX. So let's keep it around for now until we
>get things such as `jobs -p` to work.
As you wish.
Something even more trivial I noticed later: the TRACE at the end of
expbackq incorrectly refers
Ron Yorston wrote:
> ash originally had support for omitting the fork when expanding a
> builtin in backquotes. dash has gradually been removing this support,
> most recently in commit 66b614e29038e31745c4a5d296f64f8d64f5c377
> ("[EVAL] Remove unused EV_BACKCMD flag").
>
> Some traces still rema
