Re: heredoc and subshell

24.02.2016, 13:58, "Joerg Schilling" : > BTW: If I replace $(..) by `..` and feed the code to the original SVr4 Bourne > Shell, I get the same output as you got from bash. I would guess that the bash > output you added above is correct. The behavior of `..`

Re: heredoc and subshell

Eric Blake wrote: > > --- code > > prefix() { sed -e "s/^/$1:/"; } > > DASH_CODE() { :; } > > > > prefix A < > echo line 1 > > XXX > > echo line 2)" && prefix DASH_CODE < > echo line 3 > > XXX > > echo line 4)" > > echo line 5 > > DASH_CODE > > > > --- bash 4.3.42 output: >

Re: heredoc and subshell

[adding the Austin Group] On 02/23/2016 03:07 PM, Oleg Bulatov wrote: > Hello, > > trying to minimize a shell code I found an unobvious moment with heredocs and > subshells. Thanks for a cool testcase. > > Is it specified by POSIX how next code should be parsed? dash output for this > code