Re: Install fails (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Beagle 0.3.0 and Beagle-Xesam 0.1)

2007-12-03 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, Just to add to what dBera said: On 12/3/07, Henry S. Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > produces a segfault with the following trace: > > at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.String.InternalAllocateStr > (int) <0x4> > at (wrapper managed-to-native) System.String.InternalAllocateSt

Re: Install fails (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Beagle 0.3.0 and Beagle-Xesam 0.1)

2007-12-03 Thread D Bera
> I run on a Fedore 6 box which is managed centrally, i.e. I do not have > root privileges. I have been able in the past to install beagle (up > through 0.2.18) by a modest amount of hacking about and installing > other things as well, including my own mono-1.2.2.1, in my own local > tree. > > But

Install fails (was Re: ANNOUNCE: Beagle 0.3.0 and Beagle-Xesam 0.1)

2007-12-03 Thread Henry S. Thompson
I have what I'm sure is a minority problem, but would welcome any suggestions. I run on a Fedore 6 box which is managed centrally, i.e. I do not have root privileges. I have been able in the past to install beagle (up through 0.2.18) by a modest amount of hacking about and installing other things

ANNOUNCE: Beagle 0.3.0 and Beagle-Xesam 0.1

2007-12-01 Thread Joe Shaw
Hi, I'm pleased to announce the release of Beagle 0.3.0. This is a new major release. As of this release, libbeagle is distributed as a separate tarball from Beagle, which makes building of lower-level components which could depend on libbeagle (like GTK+) easier by removing a circular dependenc