Well, here we are, 3 days after beagled was started and 1 day and
3:05:22 of CPU time later and beagled is up in the 585M/364M of VM/RSS
neighborhood.
I'd sure love to have beagle with heap-shot running this long to see if
it gets this big with it and where the memory is going but it crashes
too
Hi
Recently 4 major problems have been reported with the thunderbird backend:
1) Heavy memory consumption (while parsing the mork file)
2) Exceptions while parsing the mork file
3) Indexing mails in a non-standard location (there is a bugzilla
entry for that, I think)
4) Mail directory found,
Well, here we are, 3 days after beagled was started and 1 day and
3:05:22 of CPU time later and beagled is up in the 585M/364M of VM/RSS
neighborhood.
I am sure you mentioned this somewhere before, but what backends are
you running ? If you have everything on by default, what backends are
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:43 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:14 -0500, Michael Hill wrote:
I'm running the same version here on Feisty, and I've been following
Brian's tribulations with interest. Admittedly I'm running a little
close to the wire with ~ 6 gigs free on
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 08:59 -0500, D Bera wrote:
I am sure you mentioned this somewhere before, but what backends are
you running ? If you have everything on by default, what backends are
actually active: beagle-info --index-info (when beagled is running)
will print non-zero count for the
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 08:41 -0500, D Bera wrote:
Recently 4 major problems have been reported with the thunderbird backend:
1) Heavy memory consumption (while parsing the mork file)
2) Exceptions while parsing the mork file
3) Indexing mails in a non-standard location (there is a
Hey,
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 18:09 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
They are whatever comes in Ubuntu's Feisty. Not sure if Kevin is the
maintainer there or not.
Ah, ok, you're using Feisty packages. That's fine then, that's the
official 0.2.14 release.
So 0.2.14 has the looping bugs fixed?
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 08:30 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Well, here we are, 3 days after beagled was started and 1 day and
3:05:22 of CPU time later and beagled is up in the 585M/364M of VM/RSS
neighborhood.
Do you run beagled with --debug-memory? That's a helpful thing to do,
because
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 10:59 -0500, Michael Hill wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 17:43 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
What's filling it? Logs, the text cache, or indexes?
The IndexHelper log is 1 G after about 90 minutes.
Looks like a bug. Can you send me and dBera the first 1000 and last
1000
On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 11:54 -0500, Joe Shaw wrote:
They should be fixed in 0.2.14. So what you're seeing is obviously an
uncaught one.
Cool. :-)
The main reason why it would store inside the DB instead of an xattr is
permissions.
Right.
Beagle will try to convert DB entries to xattrs
]:~$ touch /home/brian/sieve.script
and the beagle log reports:
20070123 12:44:43.6572 06019 Beagle DEBUG: *** Add '/home/brian' 'sieve.script'
(file)
Yet:
$ echo 'select * from file_attributes where filename = sieve.script;' |
sqlite3 ~/.beagle/Indexes/FileSystemIndex/FileAttributesStore.db
Yet:
$ echo 'select * from file_attributes where filename = sieve.script;' |
sqlite3 ~/.beagle/Indexes/FileSystemIndex/FileAttributesStore.db
bo7X958nykipdPCXJdiA+w|/home/brian|sieve.script|20041206030115|200701161726
17|Beagle.Filters.FilterText|0
Thanks Brian. Joe found a clue from in your
Hi,
Hmm, this might be the cause of the loop. The code always checks the
sqlite database first because it has to[1], which means that if the old
ones aren't being dropped from the DB we could be pulling old
information.
I will look into it.
Joe checked in some fixes and debugging hooks to
Hi,
Debajyoti Bera wrote:
Hmm, this might be the cause of the loop. The code always checks the
sqlite database first because it has to[1], which means that if the old
ones aren't being dropped from the DB we could be pulling old
information.
I will look into it.
Joe checked in some
Michal Pryc wrote:
D Bera wrote:
Btw, as requested in the tracker mailing list
(http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2007-January/msg00172.html),
is it possible to somehow share the test data ? It would provide an
excellent tool for testing and development purposes.
15 matches
Mail list logo