Re: [datameet] Please Comment on Copyright License for DataMeet Work

[Raphael Susewind]

Additional advantage of ODbl is that different parts of a compound
dataset can have different licenses, which makes it easier for pulling
together stuff from different sources.

On 11.04.2014 09:50, Thejesh GN wrote:
> 
> We can use  CC-BY-SA-4.0 for artifacts. It looks better and has
> everything CC-BY-SA-2.0 has
>  
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
> 
> Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
> Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
> for any purpose, even commercially.
> 
> As long as
> Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
> license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any
> reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor
> endorses you or your use.
> 
> ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you
> must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
> 
> No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or
> technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything
> the license permits.
> 
> 
> 
> I think ODC-ODbl is good choice for data. It allows all kind of usage,
> along with attribution, sharealike and keep it open condition. Unless we
> have better choice, I think we can go with ODC-ODbl. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Thej
> --
> Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
> http://thejeshgn.com
> GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Raphael Susewind
> mailto:li...@raphael-susewind.de>> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> there is a good comparison of CC vs ODBl when applied to data at
> http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/license-research-data
> 
> also, any specific reason to use CC 2.0? There are CC 4.0 licenses
> already, arguably more developed (and also more suitable for data, see
> link above)...
> 
> My five cents,
> Raphael
> 
> On 11.04.2014 09:24, Thejesh GN wrote:
> > This is for the work related to DataMeet, Produced by DataMeet as part
> > of events, hackathons or general work, for what sits on one of the
> > DataMeet accounts. Like
> > https://github.com/datameet
> > https://www.youtube.com/user/datameet
> >
> > _This doesn't apply to work by individuals themselves._
> >
> > I am listing the license and thought process behind them. Please
> do comment.
> >
> > ---
> > *For artifacts: **CC BY-SA 2.0*
> > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
> > *Idea:* Allow everyone to use it, in any way they want, as long as
> they
> > attribute and share in similar way
> >
> > Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
> > Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose,
> > even commercially.
> >
> > Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
> > license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any
> > reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor
> > endorses you or your use.
> > ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you
> > must distribute your contributions under the same license as the
> original.
> >
> > 
> > *For code: GNU/GPL*
> > https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> > Allows commercial use and make them share alike just like (but not
> same)
> > the  CC BY-SA 2.0
> >
> > - Allows remix, share, distribute (all 5 freedoms)
> > - Allows commercial usage
> > - Makes attribution and share - compulsory
> >
> > 
> >
> > *For Data : Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)*
> >
> > If we want to use specific license for data then we can use this. This
> > is similar to CC BY SA 2.0
> http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/
> >
> > You are free:
> > To Share: To copy, distribute and use the database.
> > To Create: To produce works from the database.
> > To Adapt: To modify, transform and build upon the database.
> > As long as you:
> > Attribute: You must attribute any public use of the database, or works
> > produced from the database, in the manner specified in the ODbL.
> For any
> > use or redistribution of the database, or works produced from it, you
> > must make clear to others the license of the database and keep intact
> > any notices on the original database.
> > Share-Alike: If you publicly use any adapted version of this database,
> > or works produced from an adapted database, you must also offer that
> > adapted database under the ODbL.
> > Keep open: If you redistribute the database, or an adapted version of
> > it, then you may use technological measures that restrict the work
> (such
> > as DRM) as long as you also redistribute a version without such
> m

Re: [datameet] Please Comment on Copyright License for DataMeet Work

[Thejesh GN]

We can use  CC-BY-SA-4.0 for artifacts. It looks better and has
everything CC-BY-SA-2.0 has

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
for any purpose, even commercially.

As long as
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable
manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your
use.

ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must
distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological
measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license
permits.



I think ODC-ODbl is good choice for data. It allows all kind of usage,
along with attribution, sharealike and keep it open condition. Unless we
have better choice, I think we can go with ODC-ODbl.




Thej
--
Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
http://thejeshgn.com
GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Raphael Susewind <
li...@raphael-susewind.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> there is a good comparison of CC vs ODBl when applied to data at
> http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/license-research-data
>
> also, any specific reason to use CC 2.0? There are CC 4.0 licenses
> already, arguably more developed (and also more suitable for data, see
> link above)...
>
> My five cents,
> Raphael
>
> On 11.04.2014 09:24, Thejesh GN wrote:
> > This is for the work related to DataMeet, Produced by DataMeet as part
> > of events, hackathons or general work, for what sits on one of the
> > DataMeet accounts. Like
> > https://github.com/datameet
> > https://www.youtube.com/user/datameet
> >
> > _This doesn't apply to work by individuals themselves._
> >
> > I am listing the license and thought process behind them. Please do
> comment.
> >
> > ---
> > *For artifacts: **CC BY-SA 2.0*
> > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
> > *Idea:* Allow everyone to use it, in any way they want, as long as they
> > attribute and share in similar way
> >
> > Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
> > Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose,
> > even commercially.
> >
> > Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
> > license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any
> > reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor
> > endorses you or your use.
> > ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you
> > must distribute your contributions under the same license as the
> original.
> >
> > 
> > *For code: GNU/GPL*
> > https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> > Allows commercial use and make them share alike just like (but not same)
> > the  CC BY-SA 2.0
> >
> > - Allows remix, share, distribute (all 5 freedoms)
> > - Allows commercial usage
> > - Makes attribution and share - compulsory
> >
> > 
> >
> > *For Data : Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)*
> >
> > If we want to use specific license for data then we can use this. This
> > is similar to CC BY SA 2.0
> http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/
> >
> > You are free:
> > To Share: To copy, distribute and use the database.
> > To Create: To produce works from the database.
> > To Adapt: To modify, transform and build upon the database.
> > As long as you:
> > Attribute: You must attribute any public use of the database, or works
> > produced from the database, in the manner specified in the ODbL. For any
> > use or redistribution of the database, or works produced from it, you
> > must make clear to others the license of the database and keep intact
> > any notices on the original database.
> > Share-Alike: If you publicly use any adapted version of this database,
> > or works produced from an adapted database, you must also offer that
> > adapted database under the ODbL.
> > Keep open: If you redistribute the database, or an adapted version of
> > it, then you may use technological measures that restrict the work (such
> > as DRM) as long as you also redistribute a version without such measures.
> > -
> >
> >
> > Note: If we are extending some ones code/data/artifact, we can continue
> > to use the license which the original author has used it. Its easy that
> > way. If we start one fresh we can use one of ours.
> >
> > Lets discuss this on the list. I will blog the conclusions/results on
> > datameet.org/blog  next wednesday for future
> > reference.
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot for your time.
> >
> >
> > Thej
> > --
> > Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
> > http://thejeshgn.com
> > GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
> >
> > --
> > For more details about this list
> > http://data

Re: [datameet] Please Comment on Copyright License for DataMeet Work

[Raphael Susewind]

Hi all,

there is a good comparison of CC vs ODBl when applied to data at
http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/license-research-data

also, any specific reason to use CC 2.0? There are CC 4.0 licenses
already, arguably more developed (and also more suitable for data, see
link above)...

My five cents,
Raphael

On 11.04.2014 09:24, Thejesh GN wrote:
> This is for the work related to DataMeet, Produced by DataMeet as part
> of events, hackathons or general work, for what sits on one of the
> DataMeet accounts. Like
> https://github.com/datameet
> https://www.youtube.com/user/datameet
> 
> _This doesn't apply to work by individuals themselves._
> 
> I am listing the license and thought process behind them. Please do comment.
> 
> ---
> *For artifacts: **CC BY-SA 2.0*
> https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
> *Idea:* Allow everyone to use it, in any way they want, as long as they
> attribute and share in similar way
> 
> Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
> Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose,
> even commercially.
> 
> Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
> license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any
> reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor
> endorses you or your use.
> ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you
> must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. 
> 
> 
> *For code: GNU/GPL*
> https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
> Allows commercial use and make them share alike just like (but not same)
> the  CC BY-SA 2.0
> 
> - Allows remix, share, distribute (all 5 freedoms)
> - Allows commercial usage
> - Makes attribution and share - compulsory
> 
> 
> 
> *For Data : Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)*
> 
> If we want to use specific license for data then we can use this. This
> is similar to CC BY SA 2.0 http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/
> 
> You are free:
> To Share: To copy, distribute and use the database.
> To Create: To produce works from the database.
> To Adapt: To modify, transform and build upon the database.
> As long as you:
> Attribute: You must attribute any public use of the database, or works
> produced from the database, in the manner specified in the ODbL. For any
> use or redistribution of the database, or works produced from it, you
> must make clear to others the license of the database and keep intact
> any notices on the original database.
> Share-Alike: If you publicly use any adapted version of this database,
> or works produced from an adapted database, you must also offer that
> adapted database under the ODbL.
> Keep open: If you redistribute the database, or an adapted version of
> it, then you may use technological measures that restrict the work (such
> as DRM) as long as you also redistribute a version without such measures.
> -
> 
> 
> Note: If we are extending some ones code/data/artifact, we can continue
> to use the license which the original author has used it. Its easy that
> way. If we start one fresh we can use one of ours.
> 
> Lets discuss this on the list. I will blog the conclusions/results on
> datameet.org/blog  next wednesday for future
> reference. 
> 
> 
> Thanks a lot for your time.
> 
> 
> Thej
> --
> Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
> http://thejeshgn.com
> GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
> 
> -- 
> For more details about this list
> http://datameet.org/discussions/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "datameet" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Raphael Susewind | BGHS Bielefeld University, CSASP University of Oxford
  Snail Mail | Melanchthonstr. 4a, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
   Papers & Blog | http://www.raphael-susewind.de

Please do consider http://www.gnupg.org for encryption (key id A5ED49AE)

-- 
For more details about this list
http://datameet.org/discussions/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[datameet] Please Comment on Copyright License for DataMeet Work

[Thejesh GN]

This is for the work related to DataMeet, Produced by DataMeet as part of
events, hackathons or general work, for what sits on one of the DataMeet
accounts. Like
https://github.com/datameet
https://www.youtube.com/user/datameet

*This doesn't apply to work by individuals themselves.*

I am listing the license and thought process behind them. Please do comment.

---
*For artifacts: **CC BY-SA 2.0*
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
*Idea:* Allow everyone to use it, in any way they want, as long as they
attribute and share in similar way

Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even
commercially.

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable
manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your
use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must
distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.


*For code: GNU/GPL*
https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
Allows commercial use and make them share alike just like (but not same)
the  CC BY-SA 2.0

- Allows remix, share, distribute (all 5 freedoms)
- Allows commercial usage
- Makes attribution and share - compulsory



*For Data : Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)*

If we want to use specific license for data then we can use this. This is
similar to CC BY SA 2.0 http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/

You are free:
To Share: To copy, distribute and use the database.
To Create: To produce works from the database.
To Adapt: To modify, transform and build upon the database.
As long as you:
Attribute: You must attribute any public use of the database, or works
produced from the database, in the manner specified in the ODbL. For any
use or redistribution of the database, or works produced from it, you must
make clear to others the license of the database and keep intact any
notices on the original database.
Share-Alike: If you publicly use any adapted version of this database, or
works produced from an adapted database, you must also offer that adapted
database under the ODbL.
Keep open: If you redistribute the database, or an adapted version of it,
then you may use technological measures that restrict the work (such as
DRM) as long as you also redistribute a version without such measures.
-


Note: If we are extending some ones code/data/artifact, we can continue to
use the license which the original author has used it. Its easy that way.
If we start one fresh we can use one of ours.

Lets discuss this on the list. I will blog the conclusions/results on
datameet.org/blog next wednesday for future reference.


Thanks a lot for your time.


Thej
--
Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
http://thejeshgn.com
GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0

-- 
For more details about this list
http://datameet.org/discussions/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"datameet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.