Re: [datameet] Please Comment on Copyright License for DataMeet Work

2014-04-11 Thread Raphael Susewind
Hi all,

there is a good comparison of CC vs ODBl when applied to data at
http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/license-research-data

also, any specific reason to use CC 2.0? There are CC 4.0 licenses
already, arguably more developed (and also more suitable for data, see
link above)...

My five cents,
Raphael

On 11.04.2014 09:24, Thejesh GN wrote:
 This is for the work related to DataMeet, Produced by DataMeet as part
 of events, hackathons or general work, for what sits on one of the
 DataMeet accounts. Like
 https://github.com/datameet
 https://www.youtube.com/user/datameet
 
 _This doesn't apply to work by individuals themselves._
 
 I am listing the license and thought process behind them. Please do comment.
 
 ---
 *For artifacts: **CC BY-SA 2.0*
 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
 *Idea:* Allow everyone to use it, in any way they want, as long as they
 attribute and share in similar way
 
 Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
 Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose,
 even commercially.
 
 Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
 license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any
 reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor
 endorses you or your use.
 ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you
 must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. 
 
 
 *For code: GNU/GPL*
 https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
 Allows commercial use and make them share alike just like (but not same)
 the  CC BY-SA 2.0
 
 - Allows remix, share, distribute (all 5 freedoms)
 - Allows commercial usage
 - Makes attribution and share - compulsory
 
 
 
 *For Data : Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)*
 
 If we want to use specific license for data then we can use this. This
 is similar to CC BY SA 2.0 http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/
 
 You are free:
 To Share: To copy, distribute and use the database.
 To Create: To produce works from the database.
 To Adapt: To modify, transform and build upon the database.
 As long as you:
 Attribute: You must attribute any public use of the database, or works
 produced from the database, in the manner specified in the ODbL. For any
 use or redistribution of the database, or works produced from it, you
 must make clear to others the license of the database and keep intact
 any notices on the original database.
 Share-Alike: If you publicly use any adapted version of this database,
 or works produced from an adapted database, you must also offer that
 adapted database under the ODbL.
 Keep open: If you redistribute the database, or an adapted version of
 it, then you may use technological measures that restrict the work (such
 as DRM) as long as you also redistribute a version without such measures.
 -
 
 
 Note: If we are extending some ones code/data/artifact, we can continue
 to use the license which the original author has used it. Its easy that
 way. If we start one fresh we can use one of ours.
 
 Lets discuss this on the list. I will blog the conclusions/results on
 datameet.org/blog http://datameet.org/blog next wednesday for future
 reference. 
 
 
 Thanks a lot for your time.
 
 
 Thej
 --
 Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
 http://thejeshgn.com
 GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
 
 -- 
 For more details about this list
 http://datameet.org/discussions/
 ---
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
 Groups datameet group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
 an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
 mailto:datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Raphael Susewind | BGHS Bielefeld University, CSASP University of Oxford
  Snail Mail | Melanchthonstr. 4a, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
   Papers  Blog | http://www.raphael-susewind.de

Please do consider http://www.gnupg.org for encryption (key id A5ED49AE)

-- 
For more details about this list
http://datameet.org/discussions/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
datameet group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [datameet] Please Comment on Copyright License for DataMeet Work

2014-04-11 Thread Raphael Susewind
Additional advantage of ODbl is that different parts of a compound
dataset can have different licenses, which makes it easier for pulling
together stuff from different sources.

On 11.04.2014 09:50, Thejesh GN wrote:
 
 We can use  CC-BY-SA-4.0 for artifacts. It looks better and has
 everything CC-BY-SA-2.0 has
  
 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
 
 Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
 Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
 for any purpose, even commercially.
 
 As long as
 Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
 license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any
 reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor
 endorses you or your use.
 
 ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you
 must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
 
 No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or
 technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything
 the license permits.
 
 
 
 I think ODC-ODbl is good choice for data. It allows all kind of usage,
 along with attribution, sharealike and keep it open condition. Unless we
 have better choice, I think we can go with ODC-ODbl. 
 
 
 
 
 Thej
 --
 Thejesh GN *⏚* ತೇಜೇಶ್ ಜಿ.ಎನ್
 http://thejeshgn.com
 GPG ID :  0xBFFC8DD3C06DD6B0
 
 
 On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Raphael Susewind
 li...@raphael-susewind.de mailto:li...@raphael-susewind.de wrote:
 
 Hi all,
 
 there is a good comparison of CC vs ODBl when applied to data at
 http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/how-guides/license-research-data
 
 also, any specific reason to use CC 2.0? There are CC 4.0 licenses
 already, arguably more developed (and also more suitable for data, see
 link above)...
 
 My five cents,
 Raphael
 
 On 11.04.2014 09:24, Thejesh GN wrote:
  This is for the work related to DataMeet, Produced by DataMeet as part
  of events, hackathons or general work, for what sits on one of the
  DataMeet accounts. Like
  https://github.com/datameet
  https://www.youtube.com/user/datameet
 
  _This doesn't apply to work by individuals themselves._
 
  I am listing the license and thought process behind them. Please
 do comment.
 
  ---
  *For artifacts: **CC BY-SA 2.0*
  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/
  *Idea:* Allow everyone to use it, in any way they want, as long as
 they
  attribute and share in similar way
 
  Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose,
  even commercially.
 
  Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the
  license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any
  reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor
  endorses you or your use.
  ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you
  must distribute your contributions under the same license as the
 original.
 
  
  *For code: GNU/GPL*
  https://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html
  Allows commercial use and make them share alike just like (but not
 same)
  the  CC BY-SA 2.0
 
  - Allows remix, share, distribute (all 5 freedoms)
  - Allows commercial usage
  - Makes attribution and share - compulsory
 
  
 
  *For Data : Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL)*
 
  If we want to use specific license for data then we can use this. This
  is similar to CC BY SA 2.0
 http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/summary/
 
  You are free:
  To Share: To copy, distribute and use the database.
  To Create: To produce works from the database.
  To Adapt: To modify, transform and build upon the database.
  As long as you:
  Attribute: You must attribute any public use of the database, or works
  produced from the database, in the manner specified in the ODbL.
 For any
  use or redistribution of the database, or works produced from it, you
  must make clear to others the license of the database and keep intact
  any notices on the original database.
  Share-Alike: If you publicly use any adapted version of this database,
  or works produced from an adapted database, you must also offer that
  adapted database under the ODbL.
  Keep open: If you redistribute the database, or an adapted version of
  it, then you may use technological measures that restrict the work
 (such
  as DRM) as long as you also redistribute a version without such
 measures.
  -
 
 
  Note: If we are extending some ones code/data/artifact, we can
 continue
  to use the license which