Re: Bug in DT::F::Bork

2003-08-01 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: [1] Why UTC? Wouldn't Europe/Stockholm be more appropriate? I committed this change to CVS but I think it may have uncovered some sort of weird bug in DT::TZ. Could you run the tests from the CVS version and let me know if they hang? It's not

Re: Bug in DT::F::Bork

2003-08-01 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: [1] Why UTC? Wouldn't Europe/Stockholm be more appropriate? I committed this change to CVS but I think it may have uncovered some sort of weird bug in DT::TZ. Could you run the tests from the CVS version and let me know if they hang? I take it

Re: Bug in DT::F::Bork

2003-08-01 Thread Flavio S. Glock
Dave Rolsky wrote: It's just that it has to generate _all_ the time zone changes up to the year !! That's going to take a while. I'd recommend using a year a little closer to our own. DT::TZ ships with the changes pre-generated 30 years out, so dates in that range are quick. Dates

Re: Bug in DT::F::Bork

2003-08-01 Thread Claus Färber
Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote: That's going to take a while. I'd recommend using a year a little closer to our own. DT::TZ ships with the changes pre-generated 30 years out, so dates in that range are quick. Why does DT::TZ work that way? It should be possible to determine

Re: Bug in DT::F::Bork

2003-08-01 Thread Flavio S. Glock
Dave Rolsky wrote: On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Flavio S. Glock wrote: Is this really necessary? It could generate sparse time-zone tables. Can you explain what you mean? Looking at the code in question is not enlightening me. This is some pseudo-code: $year = $dt-year; generate_tz( \%tz,

Re: long/lat - timezone map

2003-08-01 Thread Eugene van der Pijll
Iain Truskett schreef dat Nick Ing-Simmons schreef: Does anyone know of a machine-readable map that can convert lat/lon to timezone? There has been some discussion about this on the Olson db mailing list. The archive of this list can be downloaded from ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/ . You can

[ANNOUNCE] DateTime::Format::Bork 0.02

2003-08-01 Thread Joshua Hoblitt
Released to CPAN. Available immediately from: http://kolea.ifa.hawaii.edu/~jhoblitt/pm/DateTime-Format-Bork-0.02.tar.gz Changes since 0.01 - bork() now clones passed objects thanks to Eugene van der Pijll for the bug report -J --

Re: Bug in DT::F::Bork

2003-08-01 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Claus Färber wrote: Dave Rolsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb/wrote: That's going to take a while. I'd recommend using a year a little closer to our own. DT::TZ ships with the changes pre-generated 30 years out, so dates in that range are quick. Why does DT::TZ work