On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:00:54PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:55:17 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, this sounds like something very high level, which shouldn't be
considered part of the base object. But.. it is needed for really
low-level
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 09:13:07AM -0500, John Peacock wrote:
Dave Rolsky wrote:
I'm inclined to go with ISO rather than backwards compatibility with C.
We really have to go with ISO because that battle has already been fought
and won(?) in the international community. And we have
