Please ignore the last one... I biffed it too. Below is the corrected
POD.
-ben
=head3 How small an increment of time can I represent?
A can represent nanoseconds. You can create obects with
that resolution using the C parameter to C or C
and there is a corresponding C access
Oops, thanks. Revised version:
=head3 How small an increment of time can I represent?
A can represent nanoseconds. You can create obects with
that resolution using the C parameter to C or C
and there is a corresponding C accessor. For these you
give an integer count of the nanoseconds.
A mill
On Wednesday, June 11, 2003, at 07:08 PM, Ben Bennett wrote:
I added a section on nanoseconds:
The raw POD is below.
=head3 How small an increment of time can I represent?
A can represent nanoseconds. You can create obects with
=for example begin
# The ns part is 0.00230 below
my $dt_
* Ben Bennett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [12 Jun 2003 12:09]:
[...]
> I deliberately did not mention fractional_second since Dave suggests
> that it is going away... If this is not true, please let me know and
> I will add info on it.
It went a few hours ago. All the CVS commit messages sent to the
dev
I added a section on nanoseconds:
http://www.limey.net/~fiji/perl/faq.html#2.9%3A%20How%20small%20an%20increment%20of%20time%20can%20I%20represent%3F
The raw POD is below.
I deliberately did not mention fractional_second since Dave suggests
that it is going away... If this is not true, please l
