On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Rick Measham wrote:
I believe there's an error in DateTime::Locale::Base that is screwing with my
fix. Line 277 turns the CLDR notation 'y' into the strftime notation '%y'.
From my reading of
http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/tr35-9.html#Date_Format_Patterns 'y'
should
going away as well?
Thanks,
Bobby
-Original Message-
From: Dave Rolsky [mailto:auta...@urth.org]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 6:24 AM
To: datetime
Subject: Re: DateTime::Format::Strptime fails test
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Rick Measham wrote:
I believe there's an error in DateTime
All,
I'm sorry all to reply to my own post. I should have read the original
message first before replying to Dave's message. I see that the module I'm
questioning is at the root of the issue, so my apologies again.
As someone who uses DateTime::Format::Strptime quite a bit,
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Metz, Bobby wrote:
I'm sorry all to reply to my own post. I should have read the
original message first before replying to Dave's message. I see that
the module I'm questioning is at the root of the issue, so my apologies
again.
As someone who uses
Dave Rolsky wrote:
All those methods that convert to strftime patterns are deprecated and
will go away in a future release, so even if I fixed this bug, if you're
relying on them, your code will break eventually.
Erm .. I'm confused.
DateTime::Locale will no longer provide the strftime
