On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, John Peacock wrote:
I've been thinking about the API for parsers and storage methods and I have a
different suggestion than what has been discussed before. The current model
seems to assume that there is a single DateTime object type, regardless of
backend storage
- added strftime (which may move to a separate module, but it works)
Just out of curiosity does this add a dependence on POSIX.pm?
No. It's a pure Perl implementation loosely based on Graham Barr's in
Date::Format.
Sounds good - now if SF was only working...
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote:
[moved here from below:]
No, they don't. I was responding to _other_ suggestions! I don't think
you've read the whole thread.
I did indeed read the entire thread. But as my mailreader doesn't
really do threading, I may have become confused while
Dave Rolsky wrote:
I should also point out I'm moving the ical-specific bits to
DateTime::Formats::ICal.
As soon as SF gets their servers back in operation (what's up with that?), I'll
take a look at what you have. My quicky module is not meant to be an example of
anything practical, just
It looks like its back. For how long, who knows? ;)
-dave
/*===
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
===*/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Rich Bowen wrote:
All points noted and agreed. However, it still makes sense to ask
nicely. I have no interest in making enemies of these gentlemen if it is
not necessary.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:06:01PM -0500, Rich Bowen wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Rich Bowen wrote:
It would be advantageous from our pint of view to have the Perl version, so
we'd be happy to make similar arrangements. We do expect that the Perl
translation would be a full translation of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Adam Turoff wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:40:57PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
- Point out that at least some portion of this code is _already_ Free
Software. See
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Adam Turoff wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 03:40:57PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
- Point out that at least some portion of this code is _already_ Free
Software. See
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/emacs/emacs/lisp/calendar/
If this is the case, then why not
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, John Peacock wrote:
my $formatter =
DateTime::Formats::ISO8601-new
( class = 'DateTime::Implementation::TAI64' );
my $dt = $formatter-parse( ... );
That's OK, but too verbose for the average user, IMHO. It also leaps too deeply
into the API
10 matches
Mail list logo
