Re: ANNOUNCE: DateTime.pm and DateTime::TimeZone 0.01_00

2003-02-06 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 04:39:04PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote: On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Tim Bunce wrote: Er, I may well be missing something as I've not paid attention to this thread, but why not ship them both in the same distribution? Then some tests in t/*.t will test DT and some DT::DZ and

Re: ANNOUNCE: DateTime.pm and DateTime::TimeZone 0.01_00

2003-02-06 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: Now that's a PITA! It depends on Net::FTP _and_ Archive::Zip (the TZ data is in a zip file). Too much work for now at least. Take a look at e.g. Math::Pari's Makefile.PL if you want to see an example of FTP. I've used Net::FTP many

ANNOUNCE: DateTime::TimeZone 0.01_01

2003-02-06 Thread Dave Rolsky
Just a few quick fixes: - Fixed the problem running the 01load.t test seen with some versions of Test::More. Reported by John Peacock. - The generated modules no longer contain any POD, since that really doesn't serve any useful purpose, and just wastes disk space. -dave

Re: Moving the INTERNAL timezone

2003-02-06 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Rick Measham wrote: A while back Dave asked us about timezones and should setting a timezone move the internal representation or the external. We all agreed on the external. Mainly because we couldn't think of a use for internal. Well, for the first time ever, I'm using