On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Eric Cholet wrote:
I want to use the DateTime language stuff, mainly so that I can
use DateTime's strftime instead of my own cooked up one, but I
find it difficult to integrate with my applications because of
the non standard English language names it uses, instead of
Hi All,
This is to announce a new version of Astro::Sunrise.
I fixed the issue with the build I added the PREREQ_PM
to the Makefile.PL.
I also added a new function Iteration. This feature is very
alpha!!
Thanks
Ron Hill
NAME
Astro::Sunrise - Perl extension for computing the
Eugene,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:48:58PM +0100, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
Dave Rolsky schreef:
That's what Calendrical Calculations says. I'm wrong, they're right.
It'll be fixed in the next release ;)
It seems you're right; at least, most references on the internet agree.
And as
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
It seems you're right; at least, most references on the internet agree.
And as we all know, the internet can't be wrong.
The only thing more reliable than the net is The Weekly World News.
But this leads to this question: should DateTime use
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Lawrence K. Hixson wrote:
Astronomers (and their astronomical almanacs) recognize year zero (0
B.C.) as valid while Historians use 1 B.C. for zero since there was no
zero (0) in the Roman counting numbers (Julian Calendar!) therefore the
day before 0001-01-01 AD is
I've started reimplementing some of the core math in XS. If people want
to review the C code and tell me how it sucks, that'd be cool ;)
Are you planning on requiring XS for DT or also maintaining a pure Perl implementation?
-J
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
I've started reimplementing some of the core math in XS. If people want
to review the C code and tell me how it sucks, that'd be cool ;)
Are you planning on requiring XS for DT or also maintaining a pure Perl
implementation?
Good question. I
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Matthew Simon Cavalletto wrote:
However, using classes enables inheritance and other useful programming
techniques, and there's a lot to be said for that.
Good point.
Hmm. It seems like we can get the best of both worlds if we simply
allow these functions to be called
