Zefram wrote:
>Jim Monty wrote:
>>Uh-oh, I don't get the same results with DateTime 0.4304 and
ActivePerl
>>5.8.8 on Windows XP:
>
>In the changelog:
>
>|0.162003-08-06
>|
>|[ IMPROVEMENTS ]
>|
>|- The XS code now implements leap second-related calculations.
>| However, this is only used on pl
0.4305 2008-10-03
- The pure Perl version of this module did not know about the end of
2008 leap second. Reported by James T Monty.
-dave
/*==
VegGuide.Org
Your guide to all that's veg
==*/
Monty, James T wrote:
>Uh-oh, I don't get the same results with DateTime 0.4304 and ActivePerl
>5.8.8 on Windows XP:
In the changelog:
|0.162003-08-06
|
|[ IMPROVEMENTS ]
|
|- The XS code now implements leap second-related calculations.
| However, this is only used on platforms where we can
Zefram wrote:
>Jim Monty wrote:
>>Please explain this. I've always thought DateTime *does* handle leap
>>seconds correctly.
>
>DateTime `knows', falsely, that there will be no more leap seconds
after
>the last one that it knows of. You can see this, for example, by
asking
>what is the UTC time N s
