Re: Bundle::DateTime prereqs

2004-03-18 Thread Rick Measham 
On 19 Mar 2004, at 2:51 AM, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:

On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:

Does it make sense to add Module::Build to the bundle?  
DateTime::Locale
immediately asks for it.

Yeah, it seems like a good idea.
Probably.

Unfortunately, I have no internet connection at home at the moment, so 
it
could take a while for me to upload a new version. Perhaps someone 
else can do
it? (There are also some new DT modules to be added: DT::Stringify and
Daisuke Maki's new modules, for example.)


Before we do this can we rename the Bundles as we talked about 
previously?

DateTime::Bundle was to contain everything needed to have a working 
DateTime.pm
DateTime::Bundle::Complete was to contain every known datetime module 
(although the name could be wrong)

I wonder if we should also consider:
DateTime::Event::Bundle with all Event modules
DateTime::Format::Bundle with all Format modules
DateTime::Calendar::Bundle with all Calendar modules
Just for ease of installing .. they may never be used though
Cheers!
Rick Measham
Senior Developer
PrintSupply - Print Procurement & Supply Management
18 Greenaway Street VIC 3105
Tel: (03) 9850 3255
Fx: (03) 9850 3277
http://www.printsupply.com.au/

Re: Bundle::DateTime prereqs

2004-03-18 Thread Dave Rolsky 
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Eugene van der Pijll wrote:

> Unfortunately, I have no internet connection at home at the moment, so it
> could take a while for me to upload a new version. Perhaps someone else can do
> it? (There are also some new DT modules to be added: DT::Stringify and
> Daisuke Maki's new modules, for example.)

DT::Stringifiy shouldn't be added.  The next version of DateTime.pm will
include stringification overloading again.


-dave

/*===
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
===*/

Re: Bundle::DateTime prereqs

2004-03-18 Thread Eugene van der Pijll 
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> 
> > Does it make sense to add Module::Build to the bundle?  DateTime::Locale
> immediately asks for it.
> 
> Yeah, it seems like a good idea.

Probably.

Unfortunately, I have no internet connection at home at the moment, so it
could take a while for me to upload a new version. Perhaps someone else can do
it? (There are also some new DT modules to be added: DT::Stringify and
Daisuke Maki's new modules, for example.)

Eugene

-- 
+++ NEU bei GMX und erstmalig in Deutschland: TÜV-geprüfter Virenschutz +++
100% Virenerkennung nach Wildlist. Infos: http://www.gmx.net/virenschutz

Re: Bundle::DateTime prereqs

2004-03-17 Thread Dave Rolsky 
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:

> Does it make sense to add Module::Build to the bundle?  DateTime::Locale immediately 
> asks for it.

Yeah, it seems like a good idea.


-dave

/*===
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
===*/

Bundle::DateTime prereqs

2004-03-17 Thread Joshua Hoblitt 
Does it make sense to add Module::Build to the bundle?  DateTime::Locale immediately 
asks for it.

-J

--