On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, Matthew Simon Cavalletto wrote:
> Ick. That's clearly not as nice as just saying $dt->hour(17).
Whether this method is an updater is an entirely different can of worms ;)
-dave
/*===
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
==
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, David Wheeler wrote:
> It also means that users have to memorize all of the arcane strftime
> formatting characters. I don't know them all, and I use stftime all the
> time.
Exactly. Ick. Not going to happen.
> I like your extended strftime() syntax, though, and see no rea
On January 12, 2003, at 07:29 AM, Antonios Christofides wrote:
Get rid of the methods/functions returning year, month, day of week,
day of month, day of year, hour, minute, second, week of year, week of
month, whatever, and use an enhanced strftime [...]
This enhanced strftime is a very nice i
On Sunday, January 12, 2003, at 04:29 AM, Antonios Christofides wrote:
As all things, it has a downside: some additional format specifiers may
have to be defined for the enhanced strftime (and possibly strptime),
creating incompatibility with the standard strftime.
It also means that users hav
Before going into the subject, I have one request to make: is it
possible, please, to modularise the discussion on DateTime? There are
two huge threads discussing all sorts of things. I have great difficulty
following the discussion. Let's try to discuss one thing in each thread,
and give it a clea
