Re: installing DateTime-TimeZone-0.17 on HPUX 10.20... or Cygwin

2003-06-03 Thread John Peacock
Hill, Ronald wrote:
I was not able to get this to work with the HP make utility
However, I installed gmake and it works!!! I was able to 
install the DateTime-TimeZone-0.17. Where do we document
these kinda things?
Rather than document it, is there any way to fix the Makefile to have 32 1k 
lines instead of 1 32k line?  Having to require a specific make/gmake is really 
not a good plan.  It should be very unusual to require some different helper 
utility like 'gmake' to build an extension to Perl when that resident 'make' can 
build Perl itself.

John

--
John Peacock
Director of Information Research and Technology
Rowman  Littlefield Publishing Group
4501 Forbes Boulevard
Suite H
Lanham, MD  20706
301-459-3366 x.5010
fax 301-429-5748


Re: installing DateTime-TimeZone-0.17 on HPUX 10.20... or Cygwin

2003-06-03 Thread Ben Bennett
I will add it to the FAQ...

-ben

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 07:46:54AM -0700, Hill, Ronald wrote:
 
 Hi Jean  Ben,
  
  From Ben Bennet (Fri, 30 May 2003 15:24:13 -0400)
  OK, it looks like it is bombing because of all of the modules to
  install... each timezone module looks like:
  
 [snipped]
  
  This is a tough problem to solve... the easiest thing might be to try
  gnu make since that appears to be smart enough to handle arbitrarily
  long strings.  The fix probably needs to occur in MakeMaker though...
  Might be worth dropping them an email with the example.
  
  -ben
  
  I have a similar problem with make for cygwin 
 
 [snipped]
 
  The workaround I used was to type
 make -n  make-n.sh
  then edit make-n.sh to replace the 32K line
 -e yada yada yada
  by calling a make-n.pl Perl script, which contains one 32K line.
  
  May be a new item in the FAQ could be sufficient...
  
  Jean Forget
 
 I was not able to get this to work with the HP make utility
 However, I installed gmake and it works!!! I was able to 
 install the DateTime-TimeZone-0.17. Where do we document
 these kinda things?
 
 Ron Hill


Re: installing DateTime-TimeZone-0.17 on HPUX 10.20... or Cygwin

2003-06-03 Thread Ben Bennett
I still think it is a MakeMaker problem, has anyone reported it to
them?

I plan on adding it to the FAQ until we get it resolved properly.

-ben

On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:24:24AM -0700, Hill, Ronald wrote:
 Hi John,
 
  Rather than document it, is there any way to fix the Makefile 
  to have 32 1k lines instead of 1 32k line?  
 
 I guess I was not clean as what I was refering to when I
 made the statement of Document it. What I should have
 asked is Is there a place to document the test results
 that I have Sorry, I should have been more clear.
 
 However, I agree the this needs to be fixed in the 
 makefile.
 
  Having to require a specific make/gmake is really 
  not a good plan.  It should be very unusual to require some 
  different helper utility like 'gmake' to build an 
  extension to Perl when that resident 'make' can 
  build Perl itself.
  
  John
  
 You are absolutely correct!!
 
 
 Ron Hill


Re: installing DateTime-TimeZone-0.17 on HPUX 10.20... or Cygwin

2003-06-03 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Ben Bennett wrote:

 I still think it is a MakeMaker problem, has anyone reported it to
 them?

And are you guys using the latest MakeMaker?  I think this might have been
fixed in the new beta versions.


-dave

/*===
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
===*/


RE: installing DateTime-TimeZone-0.17 on HPUX 10.20... or Cygwin

2003-06-03 Thread Hill, Ronald

Hi Dave,

 
 
 On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Ben Bennett wrote:
 
  I still think it is a MakeMaker problem, has anyone reported it to
  them?
 
 And are you guys using the latest MakeMaker?  I think this 
 might have been fixed in the new beta versions.
 
 
 -dave
I just installed ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.10_04 from
CPAN.
Same results :(

Ron Hill