On Thu, 29 May 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
Uh, they could just call it DT::Language::MyLanguage, right?
Do we really want people including DT::Language::* modules in there distributions?
If it was something like DT::Language::Custom::Foo, I probably wouldn't
care.
-dave
I just realized that won't allow you specify a top level namespace. Probably not an
issue for most people. hmmm...
-J
--
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
Dave,
Here is a small patch to allow arbitrary namespaces to be passed to DT::Language.
This is useful for modules that
* Joshua Hoblitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [30 May 2003 10:20]:
I just realized that won't allow you specify a top level namespace.
Probably not an issue for most people. hmmm...
More of an issue is that it doesn't complain when one tries. It just
silently uses DT::L.
+my $real_class;
+
+
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
Here is a small patch to allow arbitrary namespaces to be passed to
DT::Language. This is useful for modules that want to include their own
DT::Language subclasses or want to generate information at runtime.
Uh, they could just call it
Uh, they could just call it DT::Language::MyLanguage, right?
Do we really want people including DT::Language::* modules in there distributions?
Anyway, I want DT::Language to go away soon in favor of DT::Locale.
I know - but it's not here yet. :)
-J
--
On Fri, 30 May 2003, Iain Truskett wrote:
* Joshua Hoblitt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [30 May 2003 10:20]:
I just realized that won't allow you specify a top level namespace.
Probably not an issue for most people. hmmm...
More of an issue is that it doesn't complain when one tries. It just
