Manjunath Hadli wrote:
This is the display driver for Texas Instruments's DM644X family
SoC. This patch contains the main implementation of the driver with the
V4L2 interface. The driver implements the streaming model with
support for both kernel allocated buffers and user pointers. It also
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:50:56, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 05:38:26PM +0530, Subhasish Ghosh wrote:
This patch adds support for the TTY compliant
Soft-UART device emulated on PRUSS.
This patch depends on:
davinci: macro rename DA8XX_LPSC0_DMAX to DA8XX_LPSC0_PRUSS.
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:19 -0400, Ben Gardiner wrote:
This patch series is comprised of three bugfixes and one cleanup that
were performed during prototyping of McASP operation in codec clock-
master frame-slave mode.
First we noticed that the check of the number of tdm slots requested
by
Hi Michael, hi jon!
I'm resurrecting this thread just to know if anyone landed on a practical
solution.
Jon Povey wrote:
Michael Hallak-Stamler wrote:
So as I understand I am on my own regarding this issue. I'm
just in absolute wonder how it is that I am the only one in
this very large
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:19:01PM -0400, Ben Gardiner wrote:
The current check for the number of tdm-slots specified by platform data is
always true (x = 2 || x = 32); therefore the else branch that warns of an
incorrect number of slots can never be taken.
Applied all of these. Please always
Hello.
On 22-04-2011 16:08, Subhasish Ghosh wrote:
This patch adds the pruss CAN pinmux and registers the device
with the pruss mfd driver.
Signed-off-by: Subhasish Ghoshsubhas...@mistralsolutions.com
---
arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 46 +++
1
Hello.
On 22-04-2011 16:08, Subhasish Ghosh wrote:
This patch adds the platform device and assignes the platform resources
for the PRUSS mfd driver.
Signed-off-by: Subhasish Ghoshsubhas...@mistralsolutions.com
[...]
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/da8xx.h
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:21:04PM +0530, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:50:56, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 05:38:26PM +0530, Subhasish Ghosh wrote:
This patch adds support for the TTY compliant
Soft-UART device emulated on PRUSS.
This patch depends on:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:19:01PM -0400, Ben Gardiner wrote:
The current check for the number of tdm-slots specified by platform data is
always true (x = 2 || x = 32); therefore the else branch that warns of
Hello Vladimir,
Davinci family of devices consist of mainly Dm6446, Dm6467, Dm365, Dm355
which are dissimilar to OMAP devices in features and registers, and some (for
ex Dm6467) in entire architecture. the current driver which you are seeing is
DM6446, but the intent is to build-up the same
Laurent,
Can you please review the patches with your suggestions from :
http://git.linuxtv.org/mhadli/v4l-dvb-davinci_devices.git?a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/forkhilman2
and let me know if you think all your suggestions are taken care of?
The patch you reviewed was :
There should be no build time dependency with this patch
(the above patch just changes which pool of SRAM the
allocation happens from)
But, this brings out an important dependency of the patch
calling platform specific sram allocator functions. There
has been SRAM allocator consolidation work
12 matches
Mail list logo
