Re: [PATCH] i2c-davinci: Implement a bus recovery that actually works

2014-03-10 Thread Mike Looijmans
On 03/09/2014 09:28 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:32:05AM +0100, mike.looijm...@topic.nl wrote: From: Mike Looijmans milo-softw...@users.sourceforge.net Having a board where the I2C bus locks up occasionally made it clear that the bus recovery in the i2c-davinci driver

Re: [PATCH RFC] net: davinci_emac: Fix rollback of emac_dev_open()

2014-03-10 Thread Christian Riesch
--On March 07, 2014 20:15 +0530 Mugunthan V N mugunthan...@ti.com wrote: On Friday 07 March 2014 07:37 PM, Christian Riesch wrote: Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at Cc: Prabhakar Lad prabhakar.cse...@gmail.com Cc: Mugunthan V N mugunthan...@ti.com Cc: Florian

Re: musb for davinci

2014-03-10 Thread Christian Riesch
Hi Alexander, --On March 09, 2014 20:58 +0100 Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote: Hello, may I ask what's the deal with drivers/usb/musb/davinci.c and why it depends on BROKEN? I've just enabled it here and it compiles and seems to work. I noticed the same for

Re: [PATCH] i2c-davinci: Implement a bus recovery that actually works

2014-03-10 Thread Wolfram Sang
I won't be doing those changes though. My sponsor's budget is limited, so I'm just having to do the minimum I can get away with. Pity. Are you available for testing in case someone comes up with a patch? signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [PATCH] i2c-davinci: Implement a bus recovery that actually works

2014-03-10 Thread Mike Looijmans
On 03/10/2014 08:26 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: I won't be doing those changes though. My sponsor's budget is limited, so I'm just having to do the minimum I can get away with. Pity. Are you available for testing in case someone comes up with a patch? Not really, the customer is using a

Re: [PATCH] i2c-davinci: Handle signals gracefully

2014-03-10 Thread Wolfram Sang
Even more, you should complete the whole transfer. There are devices where things can really go wrong if you send a half-complete command and then start with the next one. So, not checking signals at all is the way to go for I2C drivers. There is some cruft left, so I am happy about patches

Re: musb for davinci

2014-03-10 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 10.03.2014 08:21, schrieb Christian Riesch: Hi Alexander, --On March 09, 2014 20:58 +0100 Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote: Hello, may I ask what's the deal with drivers/usb/musb/davinci.c and why it depends on BROKEN? I've just enabled it here and it compiles and seems to

Re: [PATCH] i2c-davinci: Handle signals gracefully

2014-03-10 Thread Wolfram Sang
Even more, you should complete the whole transfer. There are devices where things can really go wrong if you send a half-complete command and then start with the next one. So, not checking signals at all is the way to go for I2C drivers. There is some cruft left, so I am happy about