On 11/18/2010 08:14 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:01:24, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:23:24, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Here is the pull request:
The following changes since commit 0a5b871ea4c6bfb2723ac2ffc7ef5c32452abb89:
Linus Torvalds (1):
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 8:34 AM, Michael Williamson
michael.william...@criticallink.com wrote:
On 11/18/2010 08:14 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:01:24, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:23:24, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Here is the pull request:
The
Hi,
I tested the new driver on a da830 based board and 2.6.37-rc2 based
kernel (head of the master branch of
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git).
It works fine on spi0 with direct CS for a flash
It works fine on spi1 with GPIO chip select.
The only little
Hi,
I have tested the new driver using DMA mode on our custom DM355 board. I
replaced the linux 2.6.32 spi driver by this driver and it seemed to
work except for on point. The dm355 spi polling mode was correctly
working but the DMA mode was causing some communication problems. It
appeared
Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 16:43:27, Pierre wrote:
Hi,
I have tested the new driver using DMA mode on our custom DM355 board. I
replaced the linux 2.6.32 spi driver by this driver and it seemed to
work except for on point. The dm355 spi polling mode was correctly
working but the DMA
I took the tree version of the davinci_spi.c file after every patches
have been applied ( the 49 spi patches ).
I tested with the csbug on and off before and if i remember well, it was
not working. I'll try again as soon as i have time.
The weird thing is that the problem doesn't occur at each
] spi: davinci: re-write existing driver,
DM355 DMAproblem
Hi,
I have tested the new driver using DMA mode on our custom DM355 board.
I
replaced the linux 2.6.32 spi driver by this driver and it seemed to
work except for on point. The dm355 spi polling mode was correctly
working but the DMA
Message-
From: davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com
[mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com] On
Behalf Of Pierre
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 5:13 AM
To: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/49] spi: davinci: re-write
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:23:24, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Here is the pull request:
The following changes since commit 0a5b871ea4c6bfb2723ac2ffc7ef5c32452abb89:
Linus Torvalds (1):
hardirq.h: remove now-empty #ifdef/#endif pair
are available in the git repository at:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:01:24, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:23:24, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Here is the pull request:
The following changes since commit 0a5b871ea4c6bfb2723ac2ffc7ef5c32452abb89:
Linus Torvalds (1):
hardirq.h: remove now-empty
This patch series represents a break-up into reviewable portions
of the work originally done by Brian and posted here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/114924/
While this series does not exactly add up to what Brian's patch
is, it is pretty close functionally.
This series was tested by me on
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:13:32PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
This patch series represents a break-up into reviewable portions
of the work originally done by Brian and posted here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/114924/
While this series does not exactly add up to what Brian's patch
Hi Grant,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 20:54:26, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:13:32PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
This patch series represents a break-up into reviewable portions
of the work originally done by Brian and posted here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/114924/
13 matches
Mail list logo
