Re: [PATCH 3/9] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver

2009-06-18 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi, sorry not to have answered sooner. On Tuesday 09 June 2009 00:05:10 Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > > > + > > > +/* register access routines */ > > > +static inline u32 regr(u32 offset) > > > +{ > > > + if (offset <= ccdc_addr_size) > > > > This should be <. > > > > > + return __raw_

RE: [PATCH 3/9] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver

2009-06-08 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Laurent, Laurent, Thanks for reviewing this. See my response below for few comments. Rest of them I have incorporated into my next patch. Murali Karicheri Software Design Engineer Texas Instruments Inc. Germantown, MD 20874 Phone : 301-515-3736 email: m-kariche...@ti.com >> + >> +/* register ac

RE: [PATCH 3/9] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver

2009-06-04 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
>> >> My first reaction to this is... no. I'm reluctant to have a bunch of >> driver specific hooks in the core davinci SoC specific code. I'd much >> rather see this stuff kept along with the driver in drivers/media/* >> and abstracted as necessary there. > >I agree with Kevin on this. arch/* is

Re: [PATCH 3/9] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver

2009-06-04 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi, On Tuesday 02 June 2009 02:12:41 Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Karicheri, Muralidharan" writes: > > Thanks for reviewing this. I have not gone through all of your comments, > > but would like to respond to the following one first. I will respond to > > the rest as I do the rework. > > > > > I've had

Re: [PATCH 3/9] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver

2009-06-01 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Karicheri, Muralidharan" writes: > Laurent, > > Thanks for reviewing this. I have not gone through all of your comments, but > would like to respond to the following one first. I will respond to the rest > as I do the rework. > >>I've had a quick look at the DM355 and DM6446 datasheets. The CC

RE: [PATCH 3/9] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver

2009-06-01 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Laurent, Thanks for reviewing this. I have not gone through all of your comments, but would like to respond to the following one first. I will respond to the rest as I do the rework. >I've had a quick look at the DM355 and DM6446 datasheets. The CCDC and VPSS >registers share the same memory bl

Re: [PATCH 3/9] dm355 ccdc module for vpfe capture driver

2009-05-28 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Thursday 28 May 2009 15:18:17 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi, > > most comments here apply to the DM6446 CCDC module as well. Generic > comments apply throughout the source code. > > Hans, I'd appreciate if you could review my comments, as some of them > might made according to personal preference