On 05/27/2014 06:03 PM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
On 05/27/2014 05:22 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 05/27/2014 12:32 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
[..]
I came across this patch when I was looking at a pull request from
Sekhar for EDMA cleanups, and it made me look closer at the contents
of this
On 05/27/2014 12:32 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com wrote:
The edmacc_param struct should follow the layout of the paRAM area in the
HW. Be explicit on the size of the fields (u32) and also mark the struct
as packed to
On 05/27/2014 05:22 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 05/27/2014 12:32 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
[..]
I came across this patch when I was looking at a pull request from
Sekhar for EDMA cleanups, and it made me look closer at the contents
of this file.
The include/linux/platform_data/ directory
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 4:41 AM, Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com wrote:
The edmacc_param struct should follow the layout of the paRAM area in the
HW. Be explicit on the size of the fields (u32) and also mark the struct
as packed to avoid any padding on non 32bit architectures.
The edmacc_param struct should follow the layout of the paRAM area in the
HW. Be explicit on the size of the fields (u32) and also mark the struct
as packed to avoid any padding on non 32bit architectures.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
Acked-by: Joel Fernandes jo...@ti.com
