un.com;
> >todd.fisc...@ridgerun.com
> >Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] Support for TVP7002 in v4l2 definitions
> >
> >
> >> Hans,
> >>
> >> This is only temporary and will not merge to upstream. We need to
> >> work on the RFC for HD resolutions (I h
009 11:10 AM
>To: Karicheri, Muralidharan
>Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com;
>santiago.nu...@ridgerun.com; clark.bec...@ridgerun.com;
>todd.fisc...@ridgerun.com
>Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] Support for TVP7002 in v4l2 definitions
>
>
>> Hans,
>>
>&
>>Cc: santiago.nu...@ridgerun.com; Karicheri, Muralidharan;
>>clark.bec...@ridgerun.com; todd.fisc...@ridgerun.com
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Support for TVP7002 in v4l2 definitions
>>
>>On Friday 28 August 2009 02:16:47 santiago.nu...@ridgerun.com wrote:
>>> From: Santi
t: Friday, August 28, 2009 2:42 AM
>To: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
>Cc: santiago.nu...@ridgerun.com; Karicheri, Muralidharan;
>clark.bec...@ridgerun.com; todd.fisc...@ridgerun.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Support for TVP7002 in v4l2 definitions
>
>On Fri
dgerun.com; todd.fisc...@ridgerun.com; davinci-linux-
> open-sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; clark.bec...@ridgerun.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Support for TVP7002 in v4l2 definitions
>
> Hans,
>
>
> Thanks for your review. In fact, one of my main concerns after looking
> at cu
Hans,
Thanks for your review. In fact, one of my main concerns after looking
at current viable
implementations for HD was the structure implied by v4l2_std_id -and its
organization- was
on how to improve the way controls and standards are defined. I am eager
to see the new
proposal after the
Sandeep,
Thanks for the review. I will send the patches to the linux-media list.
Regards.
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
I think you should have sent these patches to linux-me...@vger.kernel.org
as well.
-Original Message-
From: davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com
[mai
On Friday 28 August 2009 02:16:47 santiago.nu...@ridgerun.com wrote:
> From: Santiago Nunez-Corrales
>
> This patch provides required std and control definitions in TVP7002
> within v4l2.
Is this supposed to be merged into the mainline kernel? Or is this for a
non-mainline tree only?
If you wan
I think you should have sent these patches to linux-me...@vger.kernel.org
as well.
> -Original Message-
> From: davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com
> [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf
> Of santiago.nu...@ridgerun.com
> Sent: Thursd
