RE: building dsplink

2008-06-20 Thread Wan, Vincent
as to what the problem is. Best regards, Vincent -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Rhodes Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:02 AM To: Kamoolkar, Mugdha Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com Subject: Re: building dsplink

Re: building dsplink

2008-06-20 Thread Brian Rhodes
Of Brian Rhodes Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:02 AM To: Kamoolkar, Mugdha Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com Subject: Re: building dsplink Thanks for responding. I am trying to compile dsplink 1.50 and I am using codec engine 2.10. The error is with the type for 'current'. I

Re: building dsplink

2008-06-19 Thread Brian Rhodes
Thanks for responding. I am trying to compile dsplink 1.50 and I am using codec engine 2.10. The error is with the type for 'current'. I dug around for that, but could not find where it was actually located. What I am actually trying to do is load an Engine from a library which loads

RE: building dsplink

2008-06-18 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Brian, You may have an incompatible version of Linux kernel. DSPLink versions prior to DSPLink 1.50 did not inherently support linux kernel versions 2.6.18 onwards. If you need to build DSPLink on a linux kernel version 2.6.18+, you'll need to either: 1. Use DSPLink 1.50 (but note that you

Re: building dsplink with non-Montavista toolchain

2008-02-15 Thread Kai Fischer
Mughda, Dirk, Troy, many thanks for your feedback. See my comments below... We have verified DSPLink with upto 2.6.22 kernel. In our internal development for this since 1.50, we have made the following changes: /dsplink/gpp/src/osal/Linux/prcs.c: Add #include linux/sched.h

Re: building dsplink with non-Montavista toolchain

2008-02-14 Thread Dirk Behme
Kai Fischer wrote: Hi, Did anyone ever try to build dsplink 1.50 with the ELDK or CodeSourcery Toolchains and DaVinci kernel 2.6.23? Kai: I think you know http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2008-February/005220.html ? But this seems to be an other dsplink version.

RE: building dsplink with non-Montavista toolchain

2008-02-14 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Kai, We have verified DSPLink with upto 2.6.22 kernel. In our internal development for this since 1.50, we have made the following changes: /dsplink/gpp/src/osal/Linux/prcs.c: Add #include linux/sched.h /dsplink/gpp/src/osal/Linux/2.6.18/mem.c: Add #include linux/sched.h

RE: building dsplink problem with GIT 2.6.23 kernel

2007-11-07 Thread Kamoolkar, Mugdha
Hi, For now, please try instructions at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] om/msg03002.html Future releases of DSP/BIOS LINK will support kernel versions 2.6.18 and higher. Regards, Mugdha -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

RE: Building dsplink

2007-03-29 Thread Nachum Kanovsky
To: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com Subject: Re: Building dsplink Monk, Roger wrote: dpc.h is the first file in the build that tries to access the kernel headers - the errors shows it is trying to find these headers in the target fs, rather than from the kernel install. Can you

RE: Building dsplink

2007-03-28 Thread Nachum Kanovsky
DSPLINK: Modify dsplink/etc/hosts/scripts/Linux/dsplinkenv.bash to set root directory for dsplink. Modify dsplink/make/Linux/davinci_mvlpro4.0.mk to set paths to ARM compiler tools. Modify dsplink/make/DspBios/c64xxp_5.xx_linux.mk to set paths for DSP compiler tools. CMEM: Modify cmem/Rules.mak

RE: Building dsplink

2007-03-28 Thread Monk, Roger
Hi Darren, A couple of quick pointers. If you are using a DVEVMv1.1 installation and the accompanying dsplink, then your dsplink base sources will be installed in the following path :- 'DVEVM_INSTALL_DIR'/dsplink_1_30_08_02/packages/dsplink [where 'DVEVM_INSTALL_DIR' is expanded to you real