The similar MDIO HW blocks is used by keystone 2 SoCs as
in Davinci SoCs:
- one in Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) Switch Subsystem
See http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv9d/sprugv9d.pdf
- one in 10 Gigabit Ethernet Subsystem
See http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruhj5/spruhj5.pdf
Hence, reuse Davinci MDIO
The similar MDIO HW blocks is used by keystone 2 SoCs as
in Davinci SoCs:
- one in Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) Switch Subsystem
See http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv9d/sprugv9d.pdf
- one in 10 Gigabit Ethernet Subsystem
See http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruhj5/spruhj5.pdf
Hence, reuse Davinci MDIO
This patch allows to create PHYs from DT in case
if they are explicitly defined. The of_mdiobus_register() is
used for such purposes.
For backward compatibility, call of_mdiobus_register() only in case
if at least one PHY's child is defined in DT, otherwise rollback to
mdiobus_register().
On Wednesday 09 July 2014 09:10 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
The similar MDIO HW blocks is used by keystone 2 SoCs as
in Davinci SoCs:
- one in Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) Switch Subsystem
See http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv9d/sprugv9d.pdf
- one in 10 Gigabit Ethernet Subsystem
See
On Wednesday 09 July 2014 09:10 AM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
This patch allows to create PHYs from DT in case
if they are explicitly defined. The of_mdiobus_register() is
used for such purposes.
For backward compatibility, call of_mdiobus_register() only in case
if at least one PHY's child
From: Grygorii Strashko grygorii.stras...@ti.com
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 16:10:50 +0300
Required properties:
-- compatible : Should be ti,davinci_mdio
+- compatible : Should be ti,davinci_mdio or ti,keystone-mdio
Why the inconsistency in naming schemes? I don't see any reason