Re: [DB-SIG] New take on PostgreSQL bindings for Python

2006-09-08 Thread Carsten Haese
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:25, Cristian Gafton wrote: > On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Ricardo Bugalho wrote: > > DB-API's cursors have always been supposed to be based server side > > cursors. That's the whole point about having cursors. > > If some bindings don't use server side cursors when they're available

Re: [DB-SIG] New take on PostgreSQL bindings for Python

2006-09-08 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
Cristian Gafton wrote: > > > I don't believe the > driver authors are to blame - just take a look around at any bindings for > any backend and count the number of extensions people felt compelled to > add in. The desire to provide a richer functionality and more control to > the application de

Re: [DB-SIG] New take on PostgreSQL bindings for Python

2006-09-08 Thread Ricardo Bugalho
In reply to Cristan Gaton's post on Fri Sep 8 (which I didn't receive, it seems I'm missing out some db-sig posts) Cristan, when one writes a specification, one should assume that it will be implemented to it's semantical limits and implementators will seek to make it as performant and robust as

[DB-SIG] ANN: SQLObject 0.7.1rc1

2006-09-08 Thread Oleg Broytmann
Hello! I'm pleased to announce the 0.7.1rc1 release of SQLObject. What is SQLObject = SQLObject is an object-relational mapper. Your database tables are described as classes, and rows are instances of those classes. SQLObject is meant to be easy to use and quick to get started