[DB-SIG] SQLServer 2005

2009-02-04 Thread wtr_web
Hello! I need to access a SQLServer 2005 by creating, reading and writing by a single thread/single user. Has anybody experience with some openSrc SW? There are quite large amounts of data involved (around a million rows in some tables). I have only used Oracle-access myself. Thank you! wol

Re: [DB-SIG] SQLServer 2005

2009-02-04 Thread M.-A. Lemburg
On 2009-02-04 20:19, wtr_web wrote: > Hello! > I need to access a SQLServer 2005 by creating, reading and writing by a > single thread/single user. > Has anybody experience with some openSrc SW? There are quite large > amounts of data involved (around a million > rows in some tables). > I have only

Re: [DB-SIG] SQLServer 2005

2009-02-04 Thread Uwe Grauer
wtr_web wrote: > Hello! > I need to access a SQLServer 2005 by creating, reading and writing by a > single thread/single user. > Has anybody experience with some openSrc SW? There are quite large > amounts of data involved (around a million > rows in some tables). > I have only used Oracle-access m

Re: [DB-SIG] SQLServer 2005

2009-02-04 Thread Robert Brewer
wtr_web wrote: > I need to access a SQLServer 2005 by creating, reading and writing by > a single thread/single user. > Has anybody experience with some openSrc SW? There are quite large > amounts of data involved (around a million rows in some tables). > I have only used Oracle-access myself. htt

Re: [DB-SIG] SQLServer 2005

2009-02-04 Thread Bob Kline
Uwe Grauer wrote: pymssql 1.0.0 was released a few days ago: http://pymssql.sourceforge.net/ Despite it's version number, it might not be ready for prime time yet. I pulled it down to try it out, and this is what I got back from my first attempt to feed it an SQL statement: >>> cursor.e

Re: [DB-SIG] SQLServer 2005

2009-02-04 Thread Lukasz Szybalski
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:19 PM, wtr_web wrote: > Hello! > I need to access a SQLServer 2005 by creating, reading and writing by a > single thread/single user. > Has anybody experience with some openSrc SW? There are quite large amounts > of data involved (around a million > rows in some tables). >