This can be a separate effort. However, what I did not mention
earlier is that we probably should disallow the creation of new
out-of-region AUT-NUM objects if they are no longer required to
authorise ROUTE(6) objects.
>>
>> how long do you think it will be before there are no
> My personal (and I stress personal) opinion moving forward, is that
> the use of an IRR really does not sit well with the management side of
> delegation of authority in a distributed model that we have right now.
>
> If we move to a model where the IRR/RPSL "maintainer" is understood to
> be
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:59:22PM +0900, Randy Bush via db-wg wrote:
> >> This can be a separate effort. However, what I did not mention
> >> earlier is that we probably should disallow the creation of new
> >> out-of-region AUT-NUM objects if they are no longer required to
> >> authorise
My personal (and I stress personal) opinion moving forward, is that
the use of an IRR really does not sit well with the management side of
delegation of authority in a distributed model that we have right now.
If we move to a model where the IRR/RPSL "maintainer" is understood to
be documentation
