> There is an exclude list for the cleanup unreferenced objects job, and
> CAAO-RIPE is excluded, so it will never be deleted.
>
> The DB team maintains this list and will exclude an object on request.
please exclude all objects i might wish to look up.
in
Hi Ed
Well maybe we should start by discussing this exclusion list. It's the
first I have heard of it.
If such a list exists (as it does) then the reasons for exclusion
should be defined. Maybe exclusion is also the wrong term, protected
is perhaps more appropriate. Who decides if an object
Hi Will, Denis,
> On 28 Jan 2021, at 20:30, Will Scott wrote:
>
> Can I request that EON11-RIPE be added to the same list?
>
I have added EON11-RIPE to the exclude list for the cleanup unreferenced object
job.
> That satisfies my immediate goal as much as the white page,
> and the
Can I request that EON11-RIPE be added to the same list?
That satisfies my immediate goal as much as the white page,
and the visibility of this mailing list thread should be
equivalent to that of the previous one in helping the next
person who comes along and runs into the edge case of
Hi Denis,
> On 28 Jan 2021, at 19:37, denis walker wrote:
>
> Hi Will
>
> I wasn't aware that the RIPE Atlas system/service had any reliance on
> objects in the RIPE Database. Maybe Robert can elaborate more on this?
>
> There are only 4 PERSON objects in the RIPE Database that reference
>
Hi Will
I wasn't aware that the RIPE Atlas system/service had any reliance on
objects in the RIPE Database. Maybe Robert can elaborate more on this?
There are only 4 PERSON objects in the RIPE Database that reference
the Whitepages ORGANISATION object. None of these make any reference
in remarks
If the whitepages are removed, what is the recommended path
for maintiners of Atlas nodes?
The thread at
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/2016-November/003091.html
suggests that a person/role created in the DB which are used to
maintain atlas nodes will be locked and then
Hi,
On 28/01/2021 13:53, denis walker via db-wg wrote:
> I think we should now deprecate this concept. LinkedIn is much more
> suited to keeping in touch with networking people. Comments
> appreciated...
I support the cleanup.
Frank
PS: what's LinkedIn ?
;-)
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:53:53AM +0100, denis walker via db-wg wrote:
Dear Denis, All,
> I think we should now deprecate this concept. LinkedIn is much more
> suited to keeping in touch with networking people. Comments
> appreciated...
I support this cleanup.
Best regards,
--
Piotr
Hi,
I agree with this cleanup.
Kind regards
Scott Donald
From: db-wg on behalf of denis walker via db-wg
Sent: 28 January 2021 10:53
To: Database WG
Subject: [db-wg] Deprecation of whitepages
Colleagues
Way back in 2008 it was suggested that the RIPE
Hi I support the notion.
RIR DB should maintain as operation as for operational purpose only.
denis walker via db-wg 于2021年1月28日 周四下午6:54写道：
> Colleagues
>
> Way back in 2008 it was suggested that the RIPE Database could be used
> for linking people well known within the network operating
Dear Working Group,
I agree with the deprecation of the "white pages" in the RIPE DB.
In fact, I think they never worked as planned/anticipated.
The GDPR related considerations make their use even more difficult.
Best regards,
Janos
2021. 01. 28. 11:53 keltezéssel, denis walker via db-wg
Colleagues
Way back in 2008 it was suggested that the RIPE Database could be used
for linking people well known within the network operating industry.
The concept of 'whitepages' was introduced. This was an ORGANISATION
object (ORG-PAGE1-RIPE) with 'org-type: WHITEPAGES' that could be
referenced
13 matches
Mail list logo
