On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:52:37PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> Now that we've got a number of integration points available for
> feeding code into SQLite's internals, I'm wondering if we should
> consider some form of blessed or recommended namespace for people to
> write these extensions in.
>
>
As there're already several applications in the SQLite:: namespace,
it might be better to use (DBD::?)SQLite::Extension:: for the ones
to be loaded via load_extension(), and (DBD::?)SQLite::Module::
(or whatever) for the ones that adds a customized callback etc.
Kenichi
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 21:52:
Now that we've got a number of integration points available for
feeding code into SQLite's internals, I'm wondering if we should
consider some form of blessed or recommended namespace for people to
write these extensions in.
Are we just going to recommend SQLite:: or does anyone have alternatives?
