Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> Post a diff and I'll review it for you. The code you appended previously
> looks ok.
Attached is a diff for DBD::Oracle based on subversion this morning (the
diffs for oci8.c may be a little difficult to read due to the large
indentation of the surrounding code and there are
Ok that will be the next one to get done
thanks
Jan Mach wrote:
We have published len_char_size property of statement handle. Why? That's
because of nvarchar type.
You have column nvarchar(20) and you get length 40 using PRECISION (it's
right because is BYTE length). But we need for our applic
We have published len_char_size property of statement handle. Why? That's
because of nvarchar type.
You have column nvarchar(20) and you get length 40 using PRECISION (it's
right because is BYTE length). But we need for our application CHAR length
and it's done usign len_char_size.
Regards,
Jan
On 11/27/2009 01:03 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> I'd opine that since we're dealing with databases holding Important Things,
> the default should be to throw an error and make people flip a switch
> to get lax mode. A large warning in the upgreade notes should suffice for
> anyone tr
