2010/9/8 Martin J. Evans :
> On 08/09/10 08:58, Jens Rehsack wrote:
>> 2010/9/7 Martin J. Evans :
>>> After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of time to
>>> look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I noted:
>>>
>>> 1. ribasushi suggests the tests fail becau
On 08/09/10 08:58, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> 2010/9/7 Martin J. Evans :
>> After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of time to
>> look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I noted:
>>
>> 1. ribasushi suggests the tests fail because it does a rmtree when still
>>
2010/9/7 Martin J. Evans :
> After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of time to
> look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I noted:
>
> 1. ribasushi suggests the tests fail because it does a rmtree when still
> connected so the files are still open and this
On 07/09/2010 19:57, Martin J. Evans wrote:
After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of
time to look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I
noted:
1. ribasushi suggests the tests fail because it does a rmtree when
still connected so the files are still
After a small discussion on #perl today I found a small amount of time
to look at 51dbm_file.t test failures. There are a few things I noted:
1. ribasushi suggests the tests fail because it does a rmtree when still
connected so the files are still open and this fails on Windows. I don't
see t
