On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:51:50AM +0100, demerphq wrote:
> On 30 January 2012 00:16, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> > On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote:
> >
> >> I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use
> >> DBI_TRACE=DBD.
> >>
> >> I've had no problems
On 30 January 2012 00:16, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote:
>
>> I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use
>> DBI_TRACE=DBD.
>>
>> I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk.
>
> I’d like to see a st
On Jan 29, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Martin J. Evans wrote:
> I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use
> DBI_TRACE=DBD.
>
> I've had no problems with the lastest releases and subversion trunk.
I’d like to see a statement about Unicode support in the docs, and any
recommen
On 28/01/2012 10:41, Tim Bunce wrote:
I'd like to make a formal DBI release soon.
DBI-1.616_901 tested well and I've just uploaded DBI-1.616_902.
Any reason I shouldn't upload as DBI-1.617 soon?
Tim.
I'd be happy with that as I'm looking forward to asking people to use
DBI_TRACE=DBD.
I've h
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:41:56 +, Tim Bunce
wrote:
> I'd like to make a formal DBI release soon.
>
> DBI-1.616_901 tested well and I've just uploaded DBI-1.616_902.
>
> Any reason I shouldn't upload as DBI-1.617 soon?
No objections from me.
--
H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger h
I'd like to make a formal DBI release soon.
DBI-1.616_901 tested well and I've just uploaded DBI-1.616_902.
Any reason I shouldn't upload as DBI-1.617 soon?
Tim.
