Re: Accidently added CONV in SQL::Statement

2015-02-05 Thread Jens Rehsack
Am 05.02.2015 um 18:14 schrieb Peter Rabbitson : > On 02/05/2015 06:11 PM, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> Hi Michael, >> >> I think I will do. Math::Base::Convert with convert for up-to-base64 >> seems to be fine > > I still think providing an arbitrary "up to base64" conversion is a mistake. > Consid

Re: Accidently added CONV in SQL::Statement

2015-02-05 Thread Peter Rabbitson
On 02/05/2015 06:11 PM, Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi Michael, I think I will do. Math::Base::Convert with convert for up-to-base64 seems to be fine I still think providing an arbitrary "up to base64" conversion is a mistake. Consider the standardized base32 alphabet: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B

Re: Accidently added CONV in SQL::Statement

2015-02-05 Thread Jens Rehsack
Hi Michael, I think I will do. Math::Base::Convert with convert for up-to-base64 seems to be fine, whatever MySQL extended - MySQL isn't a standard I orientate myself or my software ;) Cheers, Jens Am 05.02.2015 um 18:07 schrieb mich...@insulin-pumpers.org: > Take a look at Math::Base::Convert,

Re: Accidently added CONV in SQL::Statement

2015-02-05 Thread Brendan Byrd
Sorry for my very late reply. After I wrote the CONV function, I did take much of the code and improved Math::BaseCalc with it. Although, that patch is still stuck in review ( https://github.com/kenahoo/perl-math-basecalc/pull/2). So, I don't mind if the code was stripped out to use a separate m

Re: Accidently added CONV in SQL::Statement

2014-12-17 Thread harryfmudd
Hi Jens, Thank you for trying to deal with this mess, whatever happens. The RT ticket https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=100551 was not based on any deep knowledge of SQL, its standards, and its implementations, but just on the observation that the hex representation of 16 (base 10) was

Re: Accidently added CONV in SQL::Statement

2014-12-17 Thread Jens Rehsack
Am 15.12.2014 um 10:54 schrieb Darren Duncan : > On 2014-12-15 1:40 AM, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> during review of SQL::Statement wrt. RT#100551 I realized that the >> introduced SQL_FUNCTION_CONV >> (https://github.com/perl5-dbi/SQL-Statement/blob/master/lib/SQL/Statement/Functions.pm#L454) >> i

Re: Accidently added CONV in SQL::Statement

2014-12-15 Thread Darren Duncan
On 2014-12-15 1:40 AM, Jens Rehsack wrote: during review of SQL::Statement wrt. RT#100551 I realized that the introduced SQL_FUNCTION_CONV (https://github.com/perl5-dbi/SQL-Statement/blob/master/lib/SQL/Statement/Functions.pm#L454) is unnecessary over-complex. Funny, when I first saw that se