Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:13:19PM +0100, Martin Evans wrote:
>> Tim Bunce wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:19:43PM +0100, Martin Evans wrote:
This is my second attempt to try and get some insight into how to do
this. The DBD::ODBC::ping method calls DBI::_new_sth
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:13:19PM +0100, Martin Evans wrote:
Tim Bunce wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:19:43PM +0100, Martin Evans wrote:
This is my second attempt to try and get some insight into how to do
this. The DBD::ODBC::ping method calls DBI::_new_sth
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:13:19PM +0100, Martin Evans wrote:
> Tim Bunce wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:19:43PM +0100, Martin Evans wrote:
> >> This is my second attempt to try and get some insight into how to do
> >> this. The DBD::ODBC::ping method calls DBI::_new_sth to obtain a new
> >>
Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:19:43PM +0100, Martin Evans wrote:
>> This is my second attempt to try and get some insight into how to do
>> this. The DBD::ODBC::ping method calls DBI::_new_sth to obtain a new
>> statement handle but DBD::ODBC prevents creating a new statement handle
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:19:43PM +0100, Martin Evans wrote:
> This is my second attempt to try and get some insight into how to do
> this. The DBD::ODBC::ping method calls DBI::_new_sth to obtain a new
> statement handle but DBD::ODBC prevents creating a new statement handle
> when not connected