Future DBI distribution ehancements

2010-09-21 Thread Jens Rehsack
Hi all, during the last two bigger releases (DBI-1.612 and DBI-1.614) we released the final distribution with some stress, which causes in errors which requires immediate action (DBI-1.612 failed in Win32, DBI-1.614 failes when blanks are in the full qualified path names of the test directories).

DBI 1.615 and onwards

2010-09-21 Thread Tim Bunce
Thankfully RT#61445 hasn't turned out to be a major problem. Presumably because none of the cpantesters, so far, are using "~/Library/Application Support/.cpan" as their build path. And the "whitespace characters in the current directory path" warning that Makefile.PL issues may be helping those wh

Re: DBI 1.615 and onwards

2010-09-21 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/9/21 Tim Bunce : > Thankfully RT#61445 hasn't turned out to be a major problem. > Presumably because none of the cpantesters, so far, are using > "~/Library/Application Support/.cpan" as their build path. > And the "whitespace characters in the current directory path" warning > that Makefile.P

Re: DBI 1.615 and onwards

2010-09-21 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:25:41 +0100, Tim Bunce wrote: > To simplify future development and communication I've created a new > branch for the development of the pure-perl drivers based around > DBD::File and DBI::DBD::SqlEngine: > https://svn.perl.org/modules/dbi/branches/sqlengine > > That'll let

Re: DBI 1.615 and onwards

2010-09-21 Thread H.Merijn Brand
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:21:53 +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > > Does that sound ok? > > Partially for me. > > 1) I don't know which svn version is used to store the repository, >so we might run into trouble when merging from the trunk. > 2) We should try to communicate about release cycles an

Re: DBI 1.615 and onwards

2010-09-21 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/9/21 H.Merijn Brand : > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 11:25:41 +0100, Tim Bunce > wrote: > >> To simplify future development and communication I've created a new >> branch for the development of the pure-perl drivers based around >> DBD::File and DBI::DBD::SqlEngine: >> https://svn.perl.org/modules/dbi

Re: DBI 1.615 and onwards

2010-09-21 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:56:49PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:21:53 +0200, Jens Rehsack > wrote: > > > > Does that sound ok? > > > > Partially for me. > > > > 1) I don't know which svn version is used to store the repository, > >so we might run into trouble when

Re: DBI 1.615 and onwards

2010-09-21 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/9/21 Tim Bunce : > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:56:49PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: >> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 13:21:53 +0200, Jens Rehsack >> wrote: >> >> > > Does that sound ok? >> > >> > Partially for me. >> > >> > 1) I don't know which svn version is used to store the repository, >> >    so we

Re: Future DBI distribution ehancements

2010-09-21 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:37:33AM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > Hi all, Hi Jens. [FYI Your email crossed with my "1.615 and onwards" one.] > I'm a bit confused about the immediate requirement of a fix for RT#61445 > and not even a development release 2 days after the fix has been committed, > but

Re: DBI 1.615 and onwards

2010-09-21 Thread Tim Bunce
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 04:27:25PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > 2010/9/21 Tim Bunce : > > > > I believe the server is 1.6.9 (Server:Apache/2.2.14 (Unix) DAV/2 > > SVN/1.6.9 mod_python/3.3.2-dev-20080819 Python/2.4.1 mod_ssl/2.2.14 > > OpenSSL/0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 mod_fastcgi/2.4.6 mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/

Re: Future DBI distribution ehancements

2010-09-21 Thread Jens Rehsack
2010/9/21 Tim Bunce : > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:37:33AM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: >> Hi all, > > Hi Jens. [FYI Your email crossed with my "1.615 and onwards" one.] > >> I'm a bit confused about the immediate requirement of a fix for RT#61445 >> and not even a development release 2 days after th