On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:59:51PM +1200, Duncan McEwan wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:13:05 +0100 Tim Bunce wrote:
>
> > I've added this as a note:
> >
> > Note that the ChildHandles array holds weak references and that 'from
> > time to time' the old slots get freed up. This isn't a l
I haven't tried it but you could probably modify the code I posted to test
it. With the statement handle after 120(?) loops of apparent memory leak
+1, there is a correction of -119.
Good luck.
Steve.
On 28 May 2015 05:00, "Duncan McEwan" wrote:
> Apologies for butting in on this thread, but I