RE: Patch for DBD::ODBC 1.01 for using Informix CLI, etc.

2002-12-18 Thread Jeff Urlwin
> > Fair enough comments on using a driver manager. > > I had tried to get iODBC up, but it barfed on a library I > couldn't track down - at run time, not compile/link time. I > started on unixODBC too, but then concluded I didn't want to > confuse myself - or it, or iODBC - by installing its

RE: Patch for DBD::ODBC 1.01 for using Informix CLI, etc.

2002-12-18 Thread martin
On 18-Dec-2002 Jonathan Leffler wrote: > > > > > Dear Jeff, > > Fair enough comments on using a driver manager. > > I had tried to get iODBC up, but it barfed on a library I couldn't track > down - at run time, not compile/link time. I started on unixODBC too, but > then concluded I didn't

RE: Patch for DBD::ODBC 1.01 for using Informix CLI, etc.

2002-12-18 Thread Jonathan Leffler
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | | cc: "'DBI Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

RE: Patch for DBD::ODBC 1.01 for using Informix CLI, etc.

2002-12-17 Thread Jeff Urlwin
> Dear Jeff and Tim, > > Here's a patch which more or less got DBD::ODBC 1.01 up and > running using Informix CLI as the ODBC driver (and driver > manager) on Solaris. Jonathan -- that's GREAT! FYI -- I strongly encourage people to use a driver manager, to simplify the building process. unixO

Patch for DBD::ODBC 1.01 for using Informix CLI, etc.

2002-12-16 Thread Jonathan Leffler
Dear Jeff and Tim, Here's a patch which more or less got DBD::ODBC 1.01 up and running using Informix CLI as the ODBC driver (and driver manager) on Solaris. What did I have to fix? First of all, for some reason I don't understand fully, my system was initially diagnosed as being a udbc system.