On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:56:06 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonathan
Leffler) wrote:
>The mailing list is closed - only signed up members can post.
>There's no way for groups.google.com to enforce that restriction, so
>'phantom' postings can appear at Google.
I was under the impression it was possible
David Nicol wrote:
On 12/6/05, Martin J. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 06-Dec-2005 Andy Hassall wrote:
If this is the case, then it seems that Google Groups should either make
their version of the group read-only (this would seem to be the most
sensible option since it's really a mailin
On 12/6/05, Martin J. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 06-Dec-2005 Andy Hassall wrote:
> > If this is the case, then it seems that Google Groups should either make
> > their version of the group read-only (this would seem to be the most
> > sensible option since it's really a mailing list yo
On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 03:46:06PM -, Martin J. Evans wrote:
> I needed to find a thread I remembered from this mailing list and thought of
> the list of mailing list archives on the dbi.perl.org web page. I found what I
> was after in the groups.google.com archive but was surprised to see a nu
On 06-Dec-2005 Andy Hassall wrote:
>> I cannot find these postings on the mail-archive.com or
>> nntp.perl.org archives
>> so where did they come from? Is this some sort of mailing
>> list to news gateway
>> issue I've missed?
>
> It looks like the common factor in both cases is that the postin
> I cannot find these postings on the mail-archive.com or
> nntp.perl.org archives
> so where did they come from? Is this some sort of mailing
> list to news gateway
> issue I've missed?
It looks like the common factor in both cases is that the postings were
posted through Google Groups itself o
On 12/6/05, Martin J. Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I needed to find a thread I remembered from this mailing list and thought of
> the list of mailing list archives on the dbi.perl.org web page. I found what I
> was after in the groups.google.com archive but was surprised to see a number
> of
