Thanks for the reply, Howard,
I am using the exact same database - a test database that has copies of the
production data put into it once a day - besides that it doesn't change much
(if at all) during the day.
The SQL I am using doesn't leave out a "bad guy" - I thought of that and
actually
Hmm this type of DBD::Oracle debugging will be tricky.
Could be almost anything. You are jumping versions in a big way but that still
should be ok
A few questions
1) What is the ORA-NN in question
2) Set trace to 15 to see if that give you more details
3) What are the type of
John,
Thanks so much for your reply!
I have put off this work for a few years and now the pressure is on - the
original box and OS are so old that the DBA and System Engineer and the
Operations manager have all ganged up on me.
I suppose I could try and work around by downgrading both the perl
Good question - I have asked DBA and am waiting for a reply.
-Original Message-
From: Howard, Chris [mailto:howa...@prpa.org]
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 11:36 AM
To: Fennell, Brian ; dbi-users@perl.org
Subject: RE: Hunting down (possible) memory leak in
Ok . . . I am already benefiting from the support from this list : - )
I noticed that I was actually ordering my query BY rownum (which doesn't make
much sense . . . and perhaps oracle's optimizer recognized this and ignored the
pseudo column.)
Just to be sure, I change the query and then
Pluta,
Looks like it is worth a try - when I looked at the project before it looked
like it was for installing a "per user" perl. Does it work for root / all
users on a box as well?
Brian